166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6829293)
1. Prolongation of the cochlear microphonic in man. Cochlear microphonic ringing.
Gibbin KP; Mason SM; Kent SE
Acta Otolaryngol; 1983; 95(1-2):13-8. PubMed ID: 6829293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Continuous monitoring of SP and CAP during glycerol test in Menière's disease: preliminary results.
Dauman R; Charlet de Sauvage R
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1984; 105(2 Suppl):219-21. PubMed ID: 6463443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Electrocochleographic study of Ménière's disease.
Kumagami H; Nishida H; Baba M
Arch Otolaryngol; 1982 May; 108(5):284-8. PubMed ID: 7073606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Compound action potential and cochlear microphonic extracted from electrocochleographic responses to condensation or rarefaction clicks.
Arslan E; Santarelli R; Sparacino G; Sella G
Acta Otolaryngol; 2000 Mar; 120(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 11603770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability of cochlear microphonics in clinical electrocochleography.
Kumagami H; Miyazaki M
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1987; 49(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 3601376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using a concha electrode to measure response patterns based on the amplitudes of cochlear microphonic waveforms across acoustic frequencies in normal-hearing subjects.
Zhang M
Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 25083598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of the intensity of masking noise on ear canal recorded low-frequency cochlear microphonic waveforms in normal hearing subjects.
Zhang M
Hear Res; 2014 Jul; 313():9-17. PubMed ID: 24793117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electrocochleographic study of low-tone hearing loss without vertigo.
Kumagami H; Osawa H
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1986; 48(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 3951837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Value of the study of cochlear microphonic recordings in deep and severe deafness].
Moatti L; Busquet D; Cotin G
Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1983; 100(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 6625428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Response pattern based on the amplitude of ear canal recorded cochlear microphonic waveforms across acoustic frequencies in normal hearing subjects.
Zhang M
Trends Amplif; 2012 Jun; 16(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 22696071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Reliability of the cochlear microphonics in clinical electrocochleography].
Miyazaki M
Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1987 Jun; 90(6):819-30. PubMed ID: 3668711
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Cochlear potentials in clinical audiology.
Ferraro JA; Krishnan G
Audiol Neurootol; 1997; 2(5):241-56. PubMed ID: 9390835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cochlear microphonic responses to pure tones in man recorded by a non-surgical method.
Yoshie N; Yamaura K
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1969; 252():37-69. PubMed ID: 5267211
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing infants and children: emerging data and issues.
Norton SJ; Widen JE
Ear Hear; 1990 Apr; 11(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 2340965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and cochlear microphonics: relationships in patients with and without endolymphatic hydrops.
Fetterman BL
Laryngoscope; 2001 Jun; 111(6):946-54. PubMed ID: 11404602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Audibility, speech perception and processing of temporal cues in ribbon synaptic disorders due to OTOF mutations.
Santarelli R; del Castillo I; Cama E; Scimemi P; Starr A
Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt B):200-12. PubMed ID: 26188103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cochlear microphonic responses to acoustic clicks in guinea pig and their relation with microphonic responses to pure tones.
Echeverría EL; Robles LW
J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Feb; 73(2):592-601. PubMed ID: 6841799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Narrow-band action potentials of the guinea-pig cochlea as compared with the ordinary electrocochleograms under normal and pathological conditions].
Shimamoto A
Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1990 Apr; 93(4):640-50. PubMed ID: 2376802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Role of suppressive interactions in the cochlear microphonic response to wide-band clicks.
Legouix JP; Avan P
Hear Res; 1985; 19(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 4066521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of the cochlear microphonic to a low-frequency tone embedded in filtered noise.
Chertoff ME; Earl BR; Diaz FJ; Sorensen JL
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):3351-62. PubMed ID: 23145616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
