142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6832620)
1. [Heart valve bioprostheses formed from xenopericardium and dura mater].
Fursov BA; Iaroshinskiĭ IuN; Agafonov AV; Akimova AIa; Sugrobov SP
Grudn Khir; 1983; (1):9-15. PubMed ID: 6832620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. XCD: xenogenic cervical duramater; a new anisotropic tissue for heart-valve prostheses.
Montero C; Castillo-Olivares JL; Cienfuegos JA; Figuera D
Life Support Syst; 1985; 3(3):233-46. PubMed ID: 4046638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Is cutting stress responsible for the limited durability of heart valve bioprostheses?
García Paez JM; Carrera San Martín A; García Sestafe JV; Millán I; Jorge E; Candela I; Castillo-Olivares JL
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1990 Oct; 100(4):580-6. PubMed ID: 2214834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. St Jude Epic heart valve bioprostheses versus native human and porcine aortic valves - comparison of mechanical properties.
Kalejs M; Stradins P; Lacis R; Ozolanta I; Pavars J; Kasyanov V
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 May; 8(5):553-6. PubMed ID: 19190025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pathology of the Pericarbon bovine pericardial xenograft implanted in humans.
Valente M; Ius P; Bortolotti U; Talenti E; Bottio T; Thiene G
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Mar; 7(2):180-9. PubMed ID: 9587859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative assessment of hepatic Glisson's capsule and bovine pericardium in heart valve bioprostheses.
Kagramanov II; Kokshenev IV; Dobrova NB; Kastava VT; Serov RA; Zaets SB
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 May; 7(3):273-7. PubMed ID: 9651839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Importance of the biomechanical and structural characteristics of the aortic valve in designing bioprostheses].
Volkolakov IaV; Latsis RIa; Purinia BA; Kas'ianov VA; Ledus VA
Grudn Khir; 1986; (2):41-6. PubMed ID: 3699534
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Design and performance characteristics of the Pericarbon Stentless valve.
Stacchino C; Bona G; Rinaldi S; Vallana F
J Heart Valve Dis; 1995 Jul; 4 Suppl 1():S102-5. PubMed ID: 8581203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A study of the uniaxial mechanical properties of human dura mater preserved in glycerol.
van Noort R; Black MM; Martin TR; Meanley S
Biomaterials; 1981 Jan; 2(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 7236831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intracuspal hematomas in bioprosthetic valves: pathologic findings and clinical implications.
Barnhart GR; Ishihara T; Ferrans VJ; Jones M; McIntosh CL; Roberts WC
Circulation; 1982 Aug; 66(2 Pt 2):I167-71. PubMed ID: 7083539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Description of the mathematical law that defines the relaxation of bovine pericardium subjected to stress.
Garcia Sestafe JV; García Paez JM; Carrera San Martín A; Jorge-Herrero E; Navidad R; Candela I; Castillo-Olivares JL
J Biomed Mater Res; 1994 Jun; 28(6):755-60. PubMed ID: 8071387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detoxification process for glutaraldehyde-treated bovine pericardium: biological, chemical and mechanical characterization.
Stacchino C; Bona G; Bonetti F; Rinaldi S; Della Ciana L; Grignani A
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Mar; 7(2):190-4. PubMed ID: 9587860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The functional expectations of valve bioprostheses. I. Physical and histopathological tests for the use of sections of bovine pericardium].
Braile DM; Soares MJ; Souza DR; Ramires VA; Suzigan S; Lourenço MF
Arq Bras Cardiol; 1992 Sep; 59(3):169-75. PubMed ID: 1341167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Porcine aortic valve bioprostheses: morphologic and functional considerations.
Hilbert SL; Ferrans VJ
J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1992; 2(2-3):99-112. PubMed ID: 10148319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. eComment: CorBeat trileaflet mechanical full-flow heart valve prosthesis versus native human aortic valves - evaluation of functional performance.
Bockeria LA; Fadeev A; Bockeria O; Makhachev O
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 May; 8(5):557. PubMed ID: 19380343
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Holographic interferometry and in vitro calcification: comparing pericardial versus porcine bioprostheses.
Deiwick M; Glasmacher B; Tjan DT; Reul H; von Bally G; Scheld HH
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Jul; 7(4):419-27. PubMed ID: 9697065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bioprosthetic heart valve heterograft biomaterials: structure, mechanical behavior and computational simulation.
Sacks MS; Mirnajafi A; Sun W; Schmidt P
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2006 Nov; 3(6):817-34. PubMed ID: 17280546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The pericardial bioprosthesis: altered tissue shear properties following glutaraldehyde fixation.
Boughner DR; Haldenby M; Hui AJ; Dunmore-Buyze J; Talman EA; Wan WK
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Nov; 9(6):752-60. PubMed ID: 11128780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Valvular prostheses at the present time].
Rebollar L; Alberdi I
Arch Inst Cardiol Mex; 1983; 53(1):57-81. PubMed ID: 6347105
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Forces at single point attached commissures (SPAC) in pericardial aortic valve prosthesis.
Goetz WA; Lim KH; Ibled R; Grousson N; Salgues Sle H; Yeo JH
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Feb; 29(2):150-5. PubMed ID: 16386912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
