These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6832735)
21. Narrowing an employer's right to present views, arguments, or opinions against union representation. Brown TP Employee Relat Law J; 1983; 9(2):336-42. PubMed ID: 10262703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. An 'enlightened' view of employee committees under the Taft-Hartley Act. Klaper MJ Employee Relat Law J; 1983-1984 Winter; 9(3):474-84. PubMed ID: 10265039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Management's right to loyalty of supervisors. Lederer PC Labor Law J; 1981 Feb; 32(2):83-104. PubMed ID: 10250265 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. INA action stops subcontrator's threats to fire RNs. Illinois Nursing Association. Chart; 1997 Jul; 94(7):4. PubMed ID: 9573937 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Law for the nurse manager. Is termination proper? Creighton H Nurs Manage; 1984 Jan; 15(1):50-1. PubMed ID: 6560323 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Workplace change and how it affects you. Blake N Aust Nurs J; 1997 Apr; 4(9):26-8. PubMed ID: 9304890 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. 1983-1984 Supreme Court term promises significant labor decisions. Peterson RN Health Law Vigil; 1983 Oct; 6(21):20-3. PubMed ID: 10317377 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Unfair dismissals--a fair go for whom? Blake N Aust Nurs J; 1997 May; 4(10):32. PubMed ID: 9295473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Employee clout: "Who's running this organization, anyway?". McConnell CR Health Care Superv; 1985 Oct; 4(1):70-82. PubMed ID: 10275396 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The nurse's right of self-defense. Case in point: Theodore v. Dept. of Health & Human Res. (515 So. 2d 454--LA La. App. 1 Cir. 1987). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Feb; 28(9):2. PubMed ID: 3347756 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Are worker participation plans "labor organizations" within the meaning of Section 2(5)?: a proposed framework of analysis. Beaver MS Labor Law J; 1985 Apr; 36(4):226-37. PubMed ID: 10270759 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The National Labor Relations Act and employment-at-will: the federal preemption docrine revisited. Zimmerman DA; Howard-Martin J Labor Law J; 1986 Apr; 37(4):223-34. PubMed ID: 10276868 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The Supreme Court, 1978-79--labor relations and employment discrimination. Modjeska L Cornell Law Rev; 1979 Nov; 65(1):57-74. PubMed ID: 10245115 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Economics and court decisions leading to smoke-free workplace. Goerth CR Occup Health Saf; 1984; 53(7):24, 27. PubMed ID: 6472757 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Medication error: court vacates "reinstatement order". Case in point: Russell Memorial Hosp. v United Steelworkers (720 F. Supp. 583--MI (1-89)). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1989 Dec; 30(7):4. PubMed ID: 2616770 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Strikes: strategy and tactics for managers. Loomis JM; Mulcahy RW Employee Relat Law J; 1983; 8(4):618-47. PubMed ID: 10259401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Executing doctors' orders: nursing judgment. Case in point: Williams v. Dept. of Health (422 So. 2d 1258--LA). Regan WA Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1983 Apr; 23(11):4. PubMed ID: 6551946 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Disciplinary responses to nurses' medication errors. Harnden L Dimens Health Serv; 1988 May; 65(4):26, 32. PubMed ID: 3384215 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]