BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6832917)

  • 1. An electrophysiological investigation of the macular photostress test.
    Lovasik JV
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1983 Apr; 24(4):437-41. PubMed ID: 6832917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Macular function tests with special reference to photostress test.
    Malik SR; Singh G; Sood GC; Gupta AN
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 1971 Sep; 19(3):93-101. PubMed ID: 15744978
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Macular function of successfully repaired macula-off retinal detachments.
    Ozgür S; Esgin H
    Retina; 2007 Mar; 27(3):358-64. PubMed ID: 17460592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of age related macular degeneration on the Eger macular stressometer photostress recovery time.
    Wolffsohn JS; Anderson SJ; Mitchell J; Woodcock A; Rubinstein M; Ffytche T; Browning A; Willbond K; Amoaku WM; Bradley C
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2006 Apr; 90(4):432-4. PubMed ID: 16547321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Macular pigment and visual performance under glare conditions.
    Stringham JM; Hammond BR
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Feb; 85(2):82-8. PubMed ID: 18296924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability, normative data, and the effect of age-related macular disease on the Eger Macular Stressometer photostress recovery time.
    Bartlett H; Davies LN; Eperjesi F
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Nov; 24(6):594-9. PubMed ID: 15491488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Macular dazzling test in central serous retinopathy using electronic flash.
    Verma SK; Sahai AS
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 1990; 38(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 2365430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of visual impairment on measures of cognitive function for children with congenital toxoplasmosis: implications for compensatory intervention strategies.
    Roizen N; Kasza K; Karrison T; Mets M; Noble AG; Boyer K; Swisher C; Meier P; Remington J; Jalbrzikowski J; McLeod R; Kipp M; Rabiah P; Chamot D; Estes R; Cezar S; Mack D; Pfiffner L; Stein M; Danis B; Patel D; Hopkins J; Holfels E; Stein L; Withers S; Cameron A; Perkins J; Heydemann P
    Pediatrics; 2006 Aug; 118(2):e379-90. PubMed ID: 16864640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Comparison of objective assessment using the sweep pattern visual evoked response acuity (SPVERA) and illiterate E visual acuity].
    Liu RJ; Liu HY
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Oct; 22(5):342-5. PubMed ID: 17190145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hypotrichosis with juvenile macular dystrophy: clinical and electrophysiological assessment of visual function.
    Leibu R; Jermans A; Hatim G; Miller B; Sprecher E; Perlman I
    Ophthalmology; 2006 May; 113(5):841-7.e3. PubMed ID: 16650681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Photostress with the ordinary electro-ophthalmoscope in the diagnosis of eye diseases].
    Tovkach VI
    Voen Med Zh; 1977 Aug; (8):40-4. PubMed ID: 906330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Layer-by-layer analysis of macular diseases with objectively measured visual functions.
    Miyake Y
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 1990; 34(2):225-38. PubMed ID: 2214365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. VEP pattern after photostress: an index of macular function.
    Franchi A; Magni R; Lodigiani L; Cordella M
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1987; 225(4):291-4. PubMed ID: 3653725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual evoked response in macular diseases.
    Manoj K; Sharma RG; Kumar SR
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 1991; 39(2):62-4. PubMed ID: 1916983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The glare hypothesis of macular pigment function.
    Stringham JM; Hammond BR
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Sep; 84(9):859-64. PubMed ID: 17873771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Effect of the AcrySof natural lens on glare disability and photostress.
    Hammond BR; Bernstein B; Dong J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Aug; 148(2):272-276.e2. PubMed ID: 19426959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Real-time rapid acuity assessment using VEPs: development and validation of the step VEP technique.
    Mackay AM; Bradnam MS; Hamilton R; Elliot AT; Dutton GN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Jan; 49(1):438-41. PubMed ID: 18172123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reproducible measurement of macular light flash recovery time using a novel device can indicate the presence and worsening of macular diseases.
    Newsome DA; Negreiro M
    Curr Eye Res; 2009 Feb; 34(2):162-70. PubMed ID: 19219688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The VER as a predictor of normal visual acuity in the adult human eye.
    Jenkins TC; Douthwaite WA; Peedle JE
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1985; 5(4):441-9. PubMed ID: 4088678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The macular automated photostress test.
    Dhalla MS; Fantin A; Blinder KJ; Bakal JA
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 143(4):596-600. PubMed ID: 17303062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.