These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6834353)

  • 1. The "unsatisfactory" colposcopic examination.
    Rochelson B; Krumholz BA
    J Reprod Med; 1983 Feb; 28(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 6834353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Role of endocervical curettage in colposcopy.
    Hatch KD; Shingleton HM; Orr JW; Gore H; Soong SJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Mar; 65(3):403-8. PubMed ID: 3974966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Abnormal cervical cytology in pregnancy: a 17-year experience.
    Economos K; Perez Veridiano N; Delke I; Collado ML; Tancer ML
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):915-8. PubMed ID: 8497355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Endocervical brush cytology. An alternative to endocervical curettage?
    Weitzman GA; Korhonen MO; Reeves KO; Irwin JF; Carter TS; Kaufman RH
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Aug; 33(8):677-83. PubMed ID: 3172071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Positive endocervical curettage in patients with satisfactory and unsatisfactory colposcopy: clinical implications.
    Krebs HB; Wheelock JB; Hurt WG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Apr; 69(4):601-5. PubMed ID: 3822303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Endocervical curettage in the evaluation of cervical disease in patients with adequate colposcopy.
    Soisson AP; Molina CY; Benson WL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Jan; 71(1):109-11. PubMed ID: 3336531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Colposcopic management of abnormal cervical cytology in pregnancy.
    LaPolla JP; O'Neill C; Wetrich D
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Mar; 33(3):301-6. PubMed ID: 3361522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Endocervical curettage as a routine part of colposcopic examinations for abnormal cervical cytology.
    Saltzman DH; Evans MI; Warsof SL; Friedman AJ
    J Reprod Med; 1985 Nov; 30(11):871-3. PubMed ID: 4078822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Discrepancy of cervical cytology and colposcopic biopsy: is cervical conization necessary?
    McCord ML; Stovall TG; Summitt RL; Ling FW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 May; 77(5):715-9. PubMed ID: 2014085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The value of endocervical curettage as part of the standard colposcopic evaluation.
    Granai CO; Jelen I; Louis F; Kawada CY; Curry SL
    J Reprod Med; 1985 May; 30(5):373-5. PubMed ID: 4009557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Colposcopic evaluation of patients with abnormal cervical cytology.
    Talebian F; Shayan A; Krumholz BA; Palladino VS; Mann LI
    Obstet Gynecol; 1977 Jun; 49(6):670-4. PubMed ID: 865729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of colposcopy in the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia during pregnancy and postpartum.
    Kohan S; Beckman EM; Bigelow B; Klein SA; Douglas GW
    J Reprod Med; 1980 Nov; 25(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 7452638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the cervical canal with the endocervical brush.
    Hoffman MS; Sterghos S; Gordy LW; Gunasekaran S; Cavanagh D
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 82(4 Pt 1):573-7. PubMed ID: 8377985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of colposcopy directed biopsies and cold knife conization in patients with abnormal cytology.
    Hovadhanakul P; Mehra U; Terragno A; Taylor HB; Cavanagh D
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1976 Mar; 142(3):333-6. PubMed ID: 1251312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cervical conization findings in women with dysplastic cervical cytology and normal colposcopy.
    Ramirez EJ; Hernandez E; Miyazawa K
    J Reprod Med; 1990 Apr; 35(4):359-61. PubMed ID: 2352226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Colposcopic evaluation of patients with abnormal cytologic smears during pregnancy.
    Talebian F; Krumholz BA; Shayan A; Mann LI
    Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Jun; 47(6):693-6. PubMed ID: 934559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Squamous atypia on cytology. The influence of age.
    Kaminski PF; Stevens CW; Wheelock JB
    J Reprod Med; 1989 Sep; 34(9):617-20. PubMed ID: 2553961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A critical evaluation of the endocervical curettage.
    Spirtos NM; Schlaerth JB; d'Ablaing G; Morrow CP
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Nov; 70(5):729-33. PubMed ID: 3658281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microcolposcopy vs. cone histology in evaluation of the endocervix in women with inadequate colposcopy or positive endocervical curettage.
    Hunter V; Tseng P
    J Reprod Med; 1989 Sep; 34(9):625-8. PubMed ID: 2810245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The colposcopy clinic in a residency training program. Five years' experience with colposcopically directed biopsies followed by conization or hysterectomy.
    Kelley J; Whitehouse HH; Dillard EA
    J Reprod Med; 1983 Feb; 28(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 6834352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.