These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6836048)

  • 1. Stimulation parameters influence response involvement in reinforcing brain stimulation.
    Mason PA; Laferrière A; Milner PM
    Physiol Behav; 1983 Jan; 30(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 6836048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dissociating the determinants of self-stimulation.
    Atrens DM; Sinden JD; Hunt GE
    Physiol Behav; 1983 Dec; 31(6):787-99. PubMed ID: 6665069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lateral hypothalamic stimulation gates nucleus gigantocellularis-induced aversion via a reward-independent process.
    Carr KD; Coons EE
    Brain Res; 1982 Jan; 232(2):293-316. PubMed ID: 7188027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interactions between rewarding lateral hypothalamic and aversive nucleus reticularis gigantocellularis stimulation.
    Diotte M; Miguelez M; Miliaressis E; Bielajew C
    Behav Brain Res; 2000 Dec; 116(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 11080546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interactions between aversive and rewarding effects of hypothalamic stimulations.
    Schmitt P; Karli P
    Physiol Behav; 1984 Apr; 32(4):617-27. PubMed ID: 6484013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Parametric manipulations and fixed-interval self-stimulation.
    Hunt GE; Atrens DM
    Physiol Behav; 1992 May; 51(5):1009-20. PubMed ID: 1615038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Aversive hypothalamic stimulation releases acetylcholine in the nucleus accumbens, and stimulation-escape decreases it.
    Rada PV; Hoebel BG
    Brain Res; 2001 Jan; 888(1):60-65. PubMed ID: 11146052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Behavioral responses during approach and escape induced by hypothalamic stimulation in mice.
    Ungerer A; Romieu A; Back M; Schmitt P
    Physiol Behav; 1981 Nov; 27(5):773-8. PubMed ID: 7323184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lateral hypothalamic stimulation can augment or attenuate nucleus gigantocellularis escape: evidence for appetite-associated aversion amelioration.
    Simson PE; Coons EE
    Behav Neurosci; 1989 Jun; 103(3):612-20. PubMed ID: 2544204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reward and aversive effects of lateral hypothalamic stimulation in rats measured by a modified runway and reward summation technique.
    Neeley SP; Stellar JR
    Physiol Behav; 1983 Nov; 31(5):657-62. PubMed ID: 6607478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of lesions of areas of brain--stimulation reward of one region of brain on operant behaviour for receiving electrical stimulation into sites of another region and on operant behaviour for food reward.
    Pandhari SR; Desiraju T
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 1990 Oct; 34(4):235-51. PubMed ID: 2100286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptual cues of reinforcing brain stimulations in the postero-lateral area of the hypothalamus.
    De Witte P
    Physiol Behav; 1982 Mar; 28(3):447-55. PubMed ID: 7079360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intermittent rewards raise self-stimulation thresholds.
    Fouriezos G; Emdin K; Beaudoin L
    Behav Brain Res; 1996 Jan; 74(1-2):57-64. PubMed ID: 8851915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. "Temporal summation decay" in hypothalamic self-stimulation: threshold changes at long intrapair intervals due to axonal subnormal periods.
    Yeomans JS
    Behav Neurosci; 1990 Dec; 104(6):991-9. PubMed ID: 2178349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Interaction between motivational and reinforcement components of self-stimulation zones].
    Sarkisova KIu
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1983; 33(2):311-9. PubMed ID: 6858390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preference paradigm: provides better self-stimulation reward discrimination than a rate-dependent paradigm.
    Mason PA; Milner PM; Miousse R
    Behav Neural Biol; 1985 Nov; 44(3):521-9. PubMed ID: 4084194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The notion of response invariance in trade-off studies of self-stimulation.
    Malette J; Miliaressis E
    Behav Brain Res; 1990 Oct; 40(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 2278656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Further evidence against adaptation of prolonged electrical self-stimulation reward.
    Mason PA; Milner PM
    Physiol Behav; 1986; 36(5):861-5. PubMed ID: 3714861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improvement of shuttle-box learning with pre- and post-trial intracranial self-stimulation in rats.
    Segura-Torres P; Capdevila-Ortís L; Martí-Nicolovius M; Morgado-Bernal I
    Behav Brain Res; 1988 Jul; 29(1-2):111-7. PubMed ID: 3401314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Central sites involved in lateral hypothalamus conditioned neural responses to acoustic cues in the rat.
    Nakamura K; Ono T; Tamura R
    J Neurophysiol; 1987 Nov; 58(5):1123-48. PubMed ID: 3694247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.