129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6836785)
1. Comparative study of suprapubic sonography and computed tomography for staging of prostatic carcinoma.
Denkhaus H; Dierkopf W; Grabbe E; Donn F
Urol Radiol; 1983; 5(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 6836785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Suprapubic prostatic sonography for staging prostatic carcinoma].
Denkhaus H; Dierkopf W; Donn F
Rofo; 1982 Oct; 137(4):410-6. PubMed ID: 6216177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Suprapubic prostatic sonography in the diagnosis of carcinomas and adenomas of the prostate (author's transl)].
Denkhaus H; Becker H; Bücheler E
Rofo; 1981 Sep; 135(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 6178662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparison of rectal examination, transrectal echography, CAT and MRI in the local staging of prostatic carcinoma].
Montorsi F; Guazzoni G; Consonni P; Colombo R; Nava L; Bergamaschi F; Scattoni V; Rigatti P
Arch Ital Urol Nefrol Androl; 1991 Jun; 63 Suppl 2():143-5. PubMed ID: 1836654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Prostatic cancer. Staging via transrectal prostatic sonography and computed tomography with histopathological correlation].
Cordes M; Tunn UW; Neidl K; Haasner E
Rofo; 1987 Apr; 146(4):412-4. PubMed ID: 3033764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prostatic carcinoma: detection and staging using suprapubic US.
Abu-Yousef MM; Narayana AS
Radiology; 1985 Jul; 156(1):175-80. PubMed ID: 2408295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic value of transrectal ultrasound in tumor staging and in the detection of incidental prostatic cancer.
Grups JW; Gruss A; Wirth M; Frohmüller HG
Urol Int; 1990; 45(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 2407012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Role of rectal exploration, suprapubic and transrectal prostatic ultrasonography, and PSA in the diagnosis and follow-up of prostatic carcinoma].
Speranza I; Bianco V; Banci M; Muià R; Gianni W; Bacciu O; Vecchione A; Marchei P
Minerva Med; 1998; 89(7-8):267-75. PubMed ID: 9824988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transrectal ultrasound versus digital rectal examination for the staging of carcinoma of the prostate: results of a prospective, multi-institutional trial.
Smith JA; Scardino PT; Resnick MI; Hernandez AD; Rose SC; Egger MJ
J Urol; 1997 Mar; 157(3):902-6. PubMed ID: 9072596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Usefulness and limitation of digital rectal examination and imaging studies in staging prostate cancer].
Egawa S; Kawakami T; Nishimaki H; Kuwao S; Uchida T; Yokoyama E; Mashimo S; Koshiba K
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 May; 85(5):792-801. PubMed ID: 8022142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Transrectal echography of the prostate and its value in screening for prostatic carcinoma].
Kil PJ; Hendrikx AJ; Debruyne FM
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1990 Feb; 134(8):385-90. PubMed ID: 2179743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prostate carcinoma patients upstaged by imaging and treated with irradiation. An outcome-based analysis.
Pinover WH; Hanlon A; Lee WR; Kaplan EJ; Hanks GE
Cancer; 1996 Apr; 77(7):1334-41. PubMed ID: 8608512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preoperative prediction of pathological tumor volume and stage in clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging.
McSherry SA; Levy F; Schiebler ML; Keefe B; Dent GA; Mohler JL
J Urol; 1991 Jul; 146(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 1711590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preoperative prediction of tumor heterogeneity and recurrence after radical prostatectomy for localized prostatic carcinoma with digital rectal, examination prostate specific antigen and the results of 6 systematic biopsies.
Huland H; Hammerer P; Henke RP; Huland E
J Urol; 1996 Apr; 155(4):1344-7. PubMed ID: 8632570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Reliability of endorectal echography of the prostate in the screening and staging of prostatic cancer].
Corbusier A; Vanden Bossche M; Mendes Leal A; Simon J; Wespes E; Van Regemorter G; Schulman CC
Acta Urol Belg; 1989; 57(4):831-41. PubMed ID: 2483601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Local staging of prostatic carcinoma: comparison of transrectal sonography and endorectal MR imaging.
Presti JC; Hricak H; Narayan PA; Shinohara K; White S; Carroll PR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jan; 166(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 8571856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patients with abnormal ultrasound of the prostate but normal digital rectal examination should be classified as having clinical stage T2 tumors.
Tiguert R; Gheiler EL; Grignon DJ; Littrup PJ; Sakr W; Pontes JE; Wood DP
J Urol; 2000 May; 163(5):1486-90. PubMed ID: 10751863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Staging of prostate cancer. Value of ultrasonography.
Scardino PT; Shinohara K; Wheeler TM; Carter SS
Urol Clin North Am; 1989 Nov; 16(4):713-34. PubMed ID: 2683301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of digital rectal examination and biopsy results with the radical prostatectomy specimen.
Obek C; Louis P; Civantos F; Soloway MS
J Urol; 1999 Feb; 161(2):494-8; discussion 498-9. PubMed ID: 9915434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The value of computerized tomography scan and magnetic resonance imaging in staging prostatic carcinoma: comparison with the clinical and histological staging.
Mukamel E; Hannah J; Barbaric Z; deKernion JB
J Urol; 1986 Dec; 136(6):1231-3. PubMed ID: 3773096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
