135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6839735)
21. Assessment of skin irritancy by 2 short tests compared to acute irritation induced by sodium lauryl sulfate.
Hinnen U; Elsner P; Burg G
Contact Dermatitis; 1995 Oct; 33(4):236-9. PubMed ID: 8654073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Skin irritancy from nonanoic acid.
Wahlberg JE; Wrangsjö K; Hietasalo A
Contact Dermatitis; 1985 Oct; 13(4):266-9. PubMed ID: 4085226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Sequential application of cold and sodium lauryl sulphate decreases irritation and barrier disruption in vivo in humans.
Fluhr JW; Bornkessel A; Akengin A; Fuchs S; Norgauer J; Kleesz P; Grieshaber R; Elsner P
Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):702-8. PubMed ID: 15840102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The relevance of rechallenges and pretreatment with sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) in the guinea pig maximization test (GPMT) was evaluated.
Stropp G; Berthold K; Bury D; Heusener A; Kühlem C; Pittermann W
Food Chem Toxicol; 1999; 37(2-3):266-8. PubMed ID: 10227747
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Post-application occlusion substantially increases the irritant response of the skin to repeated short-term sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) exposure.
Van der Valk PG; Maibach HI
Contact Dermatitis; 1989 Nov; 21(5):335-8. PubMed ID: 2620512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Depression or enhancement of skin reactivity by inflammatory processes in the guinea pig.
Bruynzeel DP; von Blomberg-van der Flier M; van Ketel WG; Scheper RJ
Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol; 1983; 72(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 6874098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Patch testing in the rabbit using a modified human patch test method. Application of histological and visual assessement.
Ingram AJ; Grasso P
Br J Dermatol; 1975 Feb; 92(2):131-42. PubMed ID: 1148110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Reproducibility of irritant patch test reactions to sodium lauryl sulfate in a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized study using clinical scoring. Results from a study group of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).
Brasch J; Becker D; Effendy I
Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Sep; 41(3):150-5. PubMed ID: 10475514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Basal transepidermal water loss, skin thickness, skin blood flow and skin colour in relation to sodium-lauryl-sulphate-induced irritation in normal skin.
Agner T
Contact Dermatitis; 1991 Aug; 25(2):108-14. PubMed ID: 1935039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Ranking of surfactant skin irritancy in vivo in man using the plastic occlusion stress test (POST).
Berardesca E; Fideli D; Gabba P; Cespa M; Rabbiosi G; Maibach HI
Contact Dermatitis; 1990 Jul; 23(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 2401138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Fruit acids do not enhance sodium lauryl sulphate-induced cumulative irritant contact dermatitis in vivo.
Schliemann-Willers S; Fuchs S; Kleesz P; Grieshaber R; Elsner P
Acta Derm Venereol; 2005; 85(3):206-10. PubMed ID: 16040403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Sodium lauryl sulfate-induced irritant contact dermatitis in vulvar and forearm skin of premenopausal and postmenopausal women.
Elsner P; Wilhelm D; Maibach HI
J Am Acad Dermatol; 1990 Oct; 23(4 Pt 1):648-52. PubMed ID: 2146289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Combined effects of irritants and allergens. Synergistic effects of nickel and sodium lauryl sulfate in nickel- sensitized individuals.
Agner T; Johansen JD; Overgaard L; Vølund A; Basketter D; Menné T
Contact Dermatitis; 2002 Jul; 47(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 12225409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. In vivo assessment of cytological changes by means of reflectance confocal microscopy - demonstration of the effect of topical vitamin E on skin irritation caused by sodium lauryl sulfate.
Casari A; Farnetani F; De Pace B; Losi A; Pittet JC; Pellacani G; Longo C
Contact Dermatitis; 2017 Mar; 76(3):131-137. PubMed ID: 27418013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Irritancy ranking of anionic detergents using one-time occlusive, repeated occlusive and repeated open tests.
Tupker RA; Bunte EE; Fidler V; Wiechers JW; Coenraads PJ
Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Jun; 40(6):316-22. PubMed ID: 10385334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Skin reactions to irritants assessed by non-invasive bioengineering methods.
Agner T; Serup J
Contact Dermatitis; 1989 May; 20(5):352-9. PubMed ID: 2670419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Study of cumulative irritant contact dermatitis in man utilizing open application on subclinically irritated skin.
Lee CH; Maibach HI
Contact Dermatitis; 1994 May; 30(5):271-5. PubMed ID: 8088139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Acute irritation thresholds in subjects with type I--type VI skin.
McFadden JP; Wakelin SH; Basketter DA
Contact Dermatitis; 1998 Mar; 38(3):147-9. PubMed ID: 9536406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Quantitation of contact allergy in guinea pigs by measuring changes in skin blood flow and skin fold thickness.
Andersen KE; Staberg B
Acta Derm Venereol; 1985; 65(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 2578704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Susceptibility of atopic dermatitis patients to irritant dermatitis caused by sodium lauryl sulphate.
Agner T
Acta Derm Venereol; 1991; 71(4):296-300. PubMed ID: 1681644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
