148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6839762)
1. Corrosion of filamentous intra-uterine copper. The MLCu250 and the MLCu375.
Kosonen A; Thiery M
Contraception; 1983 Jan; 27(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 6839762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Duration of use of copper releasing IUDs and the incidence of copper wire breakage.
Edelman DA; van Os WA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1990 Mar; 34(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 2311813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized trial of three copper IUDs (MLCu250, MLCu375 and Nova-T).
Bratt H; Skjeldestad FE; Cullberg Valentin K
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1988; 67(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 3051876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Concentrations of copper in human secretions and weight of the copper wire during the 4 to 7 years after insertion of a Cu-IUD (intrauterine device).
Larsson B; Frankman O; Hamberger L
Fertil Steril; 1981 Dec; 36(6):734-6. PubMed ID: 7308517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Release of copper by the Nova-T and ML Cu 250 short intrauterine devices].
Koch UJ; Lorbach J; Stange J; Stichel W
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1989; 245(1-4):1013-5. PubMed ID: 2802682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Degradation of the copper-releasing intrauterine contraceptive device and its significance.
Chantler EN; Scott K; Filho CI; Elstein M; Faragher EB; Lorimer GW; Brough I
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1984 Feb; 91(2):172-81. PubMed ID: 6696861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intrauterine devices.
Mccarthy TG; Ratnam SS
Contemp Rev Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Oct; 4(4):215-22. PubMed ID: 12345158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Immediate postpartum insertion of a copper-wired intrauterine contraceptive device, the MLCu250.
Thiery M; Van Der Pas H; Delbeke L; Van Kets H
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1979 Aug; 86(8):654-8. PubMed ID: 497136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Five years' experience of intrauterine contraception with the Nova-T and the Copper-T-200.
Luukkainen T; Allonen H; Nielsen NC; Nygren KG; Pyörälä T
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Dec; 147(8):885-92. PubMed ID: 6650625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fifteen years' experience with the Multiload IUD.
Van Os WA; Edelman DA
Adv Contracept; 1988 Sep; 4(3):165-78. PubMed ID: 3071108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Auger and pixe microanalysis of intrauterine devices (IUDs).
Foti A; Foti AM; Torrisi L
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 1990; 17(3-4):185-94. PubMed ID: 2292147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Two years' experience with two levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices and one copper-releasing intrauterine device: a randomized comparative performance study.
Nilsson CG; Allonen H; Diaz J; Luukkainen T
Fertil Steril; 1983 Feb; 39(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 6401636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An evaluation of the levonorgestrel-releasing IUD: its advantages and disadvantages when compared to the copper-releasing IUDs.
Chi IC
Contraception; 1991 Dec; 44(6):573-88. PubMed ID: 1773615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electrochemical effects of metals on IUDs.
Zipper J; Wheeler RG; Angelo S; Adrian H
Int J Fertil; 1977; 22(3):155-161. PubMed ID: 24009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Corrosion of copper in utero.
Kosonen A
Fertil Steril; 1978 Jul; 30(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 680184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Copper containing, framed intra-uterine devices for contraception.
Kulier R; O'Brien PA; Helmerhorst FM; Usher-Patel M; D'Arcangues C
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Oct; (4):CD005347. PubMed ID: 17943851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intrauterine contraception with Nova-T and copper-T-200 during three years.
Nygren KG; Nielsen NC; Pyörälä T; Allonen H; Luukkainen T
Contraception; 1981 Nov; 24(5):529-42. PubMed ID: 7032839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Copper release from copper intrauterine devices removed after up to 8 years of use.
Kjaer A; Laursen K; Thormann L; Borggaard O; Lebech PE
Contraception; 1993 Apr; 47(4):349-58. PubMed ID: 8508664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acceptability of an experimental intracervical device: results of a study controlling for selection bias.
Shain RN; Ratsula K; Toivonen J; Lähteenmäki P; Luukkainen T; Holden AE; Rosenthal M
Contraception; 1989 Jan; 39(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 2491982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Morphological characteristics of incrustates of intrauterine contraceptive devices.
Patai K; Berényi M; Asztalos M
Acta Morphol Hung; 1986; 34(1-2):3-10. PubMed ID: 3105257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
