These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

28 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6840414)

  • 1. Effects of cerebellar retractions on the cochlear nerve: an experimental study on rhesus monkeys.
    Sekiya T; Møller AR
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 1988; 90(1-2):45-52. PubMed ID: 3257838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of some nonrecursive digital filters for signals of auditory evoked responses.
    Grönfors T; Juhola M; Johansson R
    Biol Cybern; 1992; 66(6):533-6. PubMed ID: 1586677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of analog and digital filtering on brain stem auditory evoked potentials.
    Boston JR; Ainslie PJ
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1980 Mar; 48(3):361-4. PubMed ID: 6153356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A digital filter for brain stem evoked responses.
    Møller AR
    Am J Otolaryngol; 1980 Nov; 1(5):372-7. PubMed ID: 7457758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The indication for brain stem evoked response and the effect of click rate and stimulus intensity on the latencies of the auditory evoked potentials (author's transl)].
    Baschek V; Steinert W
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1980 Oct; 59(10):690-7. PubMed ID: 7453423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of low-frequency components and analog filtering on auditory brainstem responses. A comparison of analog and digital filtering.
    Svensson O; Almqvist B; Jönsson KE
    Scand Audiol; 1987; 16(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 3589480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analog and zero phase-shift digital filtering of the auditory brain stem response waveform.
    Domico WD; Kavanagh KT
    Ear Hear; 1986 Dec; 7(6):377-82. PubMed ID: 3792680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving brain stem auditory evoked potential recordings by digital filtering.
    Møller AR
    Ear Hear; 1983; 4(2):108-13. PubMed ID: 6840414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Filtering of neurophysiologic signals.
    Burgess RC
    Handb Clin Neurol; 2019; 160():51-65. PubMed ID: 31277873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital filtering of auditory evoked potentials.
    Marsh RR
    Ear Hear; 1988 Jun; 9(3):101-7. PubMed ID: 3044897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The choice of stimuli for ABR measurements.
    Gorga MP; Thornton AR
    Ear Hear; 1989 Aug; 10(4):217-30. PubMed ID: 2673891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Recent advances concerning the origin of brain stem auditory evoked potentials].
    Fabiani M; De Luca M; Trionfera A; Casini A
    Riv Med Aeronaut Spaz; 1985; 52(4):299-313. PubMed ID: 3916831
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.