These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6840414)

  • 1. Improving brain stem auditory evoked potential recordings by digital filtering.
    Møller AR
    Ear Hear; 1983; 4(2):108-13. PubMed ID: 6840414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of analog and digital filtering on brain stem auditory evoked potentials.
    Boston JR; Ainslie PJ
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1980 Mar; 48(3):361-4. PubMed ID: 6153356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A digital filter for brain stem evoked responses.
    Møller AR
    Am J Otolaryngol; 1980 Nov; 1(5):372-7. PubMed ID: 7457758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The indication for brain stem evoked response and the effect of click rate and stimulus intensity on the latencies of the auditory evoked potentials (author's transl)].
    Baschek V; Steinert W
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1980 Oct; 59(10):690-7. PubMed ID: 7453423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of low-frequency components and analog filtering on auditory brainstem responses. A comparison of analog and digital filtering.
    Svensson O; Almqvist B; Jönsson KE
    Scand Audiol; 1987; 16(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 3589480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analog and zero phase-shift digital filtering of the auditory brain stem response waveform.
    Domico WD; Kavanagh KT
    Ear Hear; 1986 Dec; 7(6):377-82. PubMed ID: 3792680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [A new method of digital filtration for the analysis of evoked potentials of the brain stem].
    Grandori F; Felisati G; Borloni R
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1987; 7(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 3618201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bessel filtering of brain stem auditory evoked potentials.
    Doyle DJ; Hyde ML
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1981 Apr; 51(4):446-8. PubMed ID: 6164544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dipole localization methods (DLM) and auditory evoked brainstem potentials.
    Grandori F
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1984; 105(2 Suppl):171-8. PubMed ID: 6463439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Highpass filtering of auditory evoked brain stem potentials (author's transl)].
    Kiessling J; Althaus V
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1981; 230(2):149-59. PubMed ID: 7295174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new parameter in brain stem evoked response: component wave areas.
    Anthony PF; Durrett R; Pulec JL; Hartstone JL
    Laryngoscope; 1979 Oct; 89(10 Pt 1):1569-78. PubMed ID: 388123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of zero-phase digital filters to enhance brain-stem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs).
    Møller AR
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1988; 71(3):226-32. PubMed ID: 2451604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital filtering and spectral analysis of the low intensity ABR.
    Kavanagh KT; Domico WD; Franks R; Han JC
    Ear Hear; 1988 Feb; 9(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 3342945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Analysis of auditory evoked response by digital processing].
    Ehara Y; Ichikawa G; Itabashi T; Harada K
    Iyodenshi To Seitai Kogaku; 1983 Jun; 21(3):174-80. PubMed ID: 6663827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of some nonrecursive digital filters for signals of auditory evoked responses.
    Grönfors T; Juhola M; Johansson R
    Biol Cybern; 1992; 66(6):533-6. PubMed ID: 1586677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrophysiologic assessment of the lower portion of the auditory pathway in the human subject. A preliminary report on auditory evoked eighth nerve and brain stem potentials including their relation to the electrocochleogram.
    Berry H; Briant TD; Winchester BT
    J Otolaryngol; 1976 Feb; 5(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 1053157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Analysis of the phase characteristics of the electrical activity of the brain stem in the evaluation of human auditory function].
    Afonchenko VS; Khvoles RA
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1987; 37(1):150-3. PubMed ID: 3577405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Strategies for infant auditory brain stem response assessment.
    Jacobson JT; Morehouse CR; Johnson MJ
    Ear Hear; 1982; 3(5):263-70. PubMed ID: 7141140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analog and digital filtering of the brain stem auditory evoked response.
    Kavanagh KT; Franks R
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1989 Jul; 98(7 Pt 1):508-14. PubMed ID: 2751210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The choice of stimulus in the auditory brainstem response test for neurological and audiological examinations.
    Suzuki J; Yamane H
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1982; 388():731-6. PubMed ID: 6953910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.