These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6841799)

  • 1. Cochlear microphonic responses to acoustic clicks in guinea pig and their relation with microphonic responses to pure tones.
    Echeverría EL; Robles LW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Feb; 73(2):592-601. PubMed ID: 6841799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Role of suppressive interactions in the cochlear microphonic response to wide-band clicks.
    Legouix JP; Avan P
    Hear Res; 1985; 19(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 4066521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The spectral content of the cochlear microphonic measured in scala media of the guinea pig cochlea.
    Hubbard AE; Mountain DC; Geisler CD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1979 Aug; 66(2):415-30. PubMed ID: 512203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comments on the effects of overstimulation on microphonic sensitivity.
    Durrant JD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1979 Aug; 66(2):597-8. PubMed ID: 512210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The origin of the low-frequency microphonic in the first cochlear turn of guinea-pig.
    Patuzzi RB; Yates GK; Johnstone BM
    Hear Res; 1989 May; 39(1-2):177-88. PubMed ID: 2737964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The frequency selectivity of auditory nerve fibres and hair cells in the cochlea of the turtle.
    Crawford AC; Fettiplace R
    J Physiol; 1980 Sep; 306():79-125. PubMed ID: 7463380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Low-frequency characteristics of intracellularly recorded receptor potentials in guinea-pig cochlear hair cells.
    Russell IJ; Sellick PM
    J Physiol; 1983 May; 338():179-206. PubMed ID: 6875955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of modulation of basilar membrane position on the cochlear microphonic.
    Pierson M; Møller A
    Hear Res; 1980 Mar; 2(2):151-62. PubMed ID: 7364670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modifications of the nonlinearity of the cochlear microphonic responses produced by noise exposure in the guinea pig.
    Legouix JP; Joannès M
    Hear Res; 1984 Apr; 14(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 6746420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrophysiological responses in guinea pig cochlea to low frequency sound stimuli: distortion of cochlear microphonic (CM) wave form.
    Maehara N; Sadamoto T; Yamamura K
    Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1983; 51(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 6684037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Suppression of the acoustically evoked auditory-nerve response by electrical stimulation in the cochlea of the guinea pig.
    Stronks HC; Versnel H; Prijs VF; Klis SF
    Hear Res; 2010 Jan; 259(1-2):64-74. PubMed ID: 19840841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cochlear microphonic evidence for mechanical propagation of distortion products (f2 - f1) and (2f1 - f2).
    Gibian GL; Kim DO
    Hear Res; 1982 Jan; 6(1):35-59. PubMed ID: 7054135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contrast enhancement in frequency spectra of cochlear microphonic responses to complex stimuli.
    Wit HP; Horst JW
    Hear Res; 1986; 21(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 3957796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variations of cochlear microphonic potential after sectioning efferent fibers to the cochlea.
    Bonfils P; Remond MC; Pujol R
    Hear Res; 1987; 30(2-3):267-71. PubMed ID: 3680069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Suppression of spontaneous AC potentials in guinea pig cochlea by external tones].
    Yoshida M; Aoyagi M; Makishima K
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1996 Feb; 99(2):327-32. PubMed ID: 8851339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using a concha electrode to measure response patterns based on the amplitudes of cochlear microphonic waveforms across acoustic frequencies in normal-hearing subjects.
    Zhang M
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 25083598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sound-induced resistance changes in the inner ear.
    Geisler CD; Mountain DC; Hubbard AE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 May; 67(5):1729-35. PubMed ID: 7372927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cochlear microphonic responses of the peripheral auditory system to frequency-varying signals.
    Shore SE; Cullen JK
    Am J Otolaryngol; 1984; 5(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 6534192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cochlear microphonic enhancement in two tone interactions.
    Nuttall AL; Dolan DF
    Hear Res; 1991 Feb; 51(2):235-45. PubMed ID: 2032959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Voltage-dependent elements are involved in the generation of the cochlear microphonic and the sound-induced resistance changes measured in scala media of the guinea pig.
    Mountain DC; Hubbard AE; Geisler CD
    Hear Res; 1980 Oct; 3(3):215-29. PubMed ID: 7440425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.