BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6841822)

  • 1. Tuning curves and pitch matches in a listener with a unilateral, low-frequency hearing loss.
    Florentine M; Houtsma AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Mar; 73(3):961-5. PubMed ID: 6841822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new procedure for measuring peripheral compression in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Nelson DA; Schroder AC; Wojtczak M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2045-64. PubMed ID: 11681384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lateralization and frequency selectivity in normal and impaired hearing.
    Buus S; Scharf B; Florentine M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Jul; 76(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 6747115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of cochlear impairment and equivalent-threshold masking on psychoacoustic tuning curves.
    Florentine M
    Audiology; 1992; 31(5):241-53. PubMed ID: 1449429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of stimulus level on forward-masked psychophysical tuning curves in quiet and in noise.
    Nelson DA; Chargo SJ; Kopun JG; Freyman RL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Nov; 88(5):2143-51. PubMed ID: 2269730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Midfrequency dysfunction in listeners having high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Humes LE
    J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Sep; 26(3):425-35. PubMed ID: 6645468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An analysis of psychophysical tuning curves in normal and pathological ears.
    Carney AE; Nelson DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Jan; 73(1):268-78. PubMed ID: 6826895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Off-frequency listening: effects on psychoacoustical tuning curves obtained in simultaneous and forward masking.
    O'Loughlin BJ; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Apr; 69(4):1119-25. PubMed ID: 7229199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Informational masking in hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners: sensation level and decision weights.
    Alexander JM; Lutfi RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct; 116(4 Pt 1):2234-47. PubMed ID: 15532655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pure tone pitch perception and low-frequency hearing loss.
    Turner C; Burns EM; Nelson DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Mar; 73(3):966-75. PubMed ID: 6841823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection of interaural phase shift between a subaudible and an audible tone.
    Ayres TJ; Clack TD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Aug; 76(2):411-3. PubMed ID: 6480992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Informational masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Micheyl C; Arthaud P; Reinhart C; Collet L
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2000 Mar; 120(2):242-6. PubMed ID: 11603782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A method for determining interaural attenuation in animal models of asymmetric hearing loss.
    Megerian CA; Burkard RF; Ravicz ME
    Audiol Neurootol; 1996; 1(4):214-9. PubMed ID: 9390803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. High-level psychophysical tuning curves: simultaneous masking by pure tones and 100-Hz-wide noise bands.
    Nelson DA; Fortune TW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Apr; 34(2):360-73. PubMed ID: 2046360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The frequency selectivity of the normal and pathological human cochlea.
    Harrison RV; Aran JM; Negrevergne M
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1981; 230(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 7271565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of cochlear hearing loss and probe tone level on compound action potential tuning curves in humans.
    Rutten WL
    Hear Res; 1986; 21(3):195-204. PubMed ID: 3722003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High-level psychophysical tuning curves: forward masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Nelson DA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Dec; 34(6):1233-49. PubMed ID: 1787705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparisons of frequency selectivity in simultaneous and forward masking for subjects with unilateral cochlear impairments.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Jul; 80(1):93-107. PubMed ID: 3745670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Temporal overshoot in simultaneous-masked psychophysical tuning curves from normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Kimberley BP; Nelson DA; Bacon SP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Apr; 85(4):1660-5. PubMed ID: 2708681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical application of long-term intensity and pitch matches in fluctuating low-frequency hearing loss.
    Jonas Brannstrom K; Grenner J
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Jul; 47(7):412-9. PubMed ID: 18574779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.