These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6844871)
41. [Auditory neuropathy]. Wang J; Gao L; Xue F; Meng M; Zha D; Deng Y Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Oct; 16(10):518-20. PubMed ID: 15515556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Auditory detection, discrimination and speech processing in ageing, noise-sensitive and hearing-impaired listeners. Abel SM; Krever EM; Alberti PW Scand Audiol; 1990; 19(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 2336540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [Otoacoustic emissions, auditory evoked potentials, pure tone thresholds and speech intelligibility in cases of auditory neuropathy]. Ptok M HNO; 2000 Jan; 48(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 10663046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids. Davidson LS Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. [Characteristics of sensorineural hearing loss secondary to inner ear acoustic trauma]. Spremo S; Stupar Z Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2008; 136(5-6):221-5. PubMed ID: 18792616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Midfrequency dysfunction in listeners having high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss. Humes LE J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Sep; 26(3):425-35. PubMed ID: 6645468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Acoustic stapedius reflex function in man revisited. Aiken SJ; Andrus JN; Bance M; Phillips DP Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):e38-51. PubMed ID: 23403808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Methods for early identification of noise-induced hearing loss. Hall AJ; Lutman ME Audiology; 1999; 38(5):277-80. PubMed ID: 10548376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Nonsurgical factors predictive of postoperative hearing for patients with vestibular schwannoma. Robinette MS; Bauch CD; Olsen WO; Harner SG; Beatty CW Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6):738-45. PubMed ID: 9391670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The effect of the 226-Hz probe level on contralateral acoustic stapedius reflex thresholds. Day JE; Feeney MP J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Aug; 51(4):1016-25. PubMed ID: 18658068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 1: test evaluation for noise-induced hearing loss identification. Leensen MC; de Laat JA; Dreschler WA Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):823-34. PubMed ID: 21988504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Prediction of speech audiometry as compared to pure-tone audiometry in the estimation of the importance of noise]. De Heyn G Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1986; 40(4):615-27. PubMed ID: 3799179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Audiologic phenotype of osteogenesis imperfecta: use in clinical differentiation. Swinnen FK; Dhooge IJ; Coucke PJ; D'Eufemia P; Zardo F; Garretsen TJ; Cremers CW; De Leenheer EM Otol Neurotol; 2012 Feb; 33(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 22143304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. [Stapedial reflex test for gerontal sensorineural hearing loss]. Guo HG Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1993; 28(3):160-1, 187. PubMed ID: 8217297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Diagnostic utility of the acoustic reflex in predicting hearing in paediatric populations. Pérez-Villa YE; Mena-Ramírez ME; Aguirre LE; Mora-Magaña I; Gutiérrez-Farfán IS Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2014; 65(6):332-8. PubMed ID: 24997124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Acoustic reflex thresholds in normal and cochlear-impaired ears: effects of no-response rates on 90th percentiles in a large sample. Gelfand SA; Schwander T; Silman S J Speech Hear Disord; 1990 May; 55(2):198-205. PubMed ID: 2329784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]