These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Comparison of anteroposterior and posteroanterior projection in lumbar spine radiography. Alukic E; Skrk D; Mekis N Radiol Oncol; 2018 May; 52(4):468-474. PubMed ID: 30511934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs: an adequate lumbar spine examination. Scavone JG; Latshaw RF; Weidner WA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1981 Apr; 136(4):715-7. PubMed ID: 6784466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Low-dose computed tomography of the lumbar spine: a phantom study on imaging parameters and image quality. Alshamari M; Geijer M; Norrman E; Geijer H Acta Radiol; 2014 Sep; 55(7):824-32. PubMed ID: 24215904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Are routine oblique roentgenograms of the lumbar spine of value? DeLuca SA; Rhea JT J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1981 Jun; 63(5):846. PubMed ID: 7240312 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Achieving dose reduction in lumbar spine radiography. Heriard JB; Terry JA; Arnold AL Radiol Technol; 1993; 65(2):97-103; quiz 104-6. PubMed ID: 8284371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lumbar spine radiology: analysis of the posteroanterior projection. Brennan PC; Madigan E Eur Radiol; 2000; 10(7):1197-201. PubMed ID: 11003420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A pilot study investigating two dose reduction techniques for AP lumbar spine radiography using direct dosimetry and Projection VR. Shanahan MC Radiography (Lond); 2017 Aug; 23(3):222-228. PubMed ID: 28687290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lumbar spine radiographs - is it time for widespread adoption of posteroanterior projection? Green C; Karnati G; Thomson K; Subramanian A Br J Radiol; 2019 Nov; 92(1103):20190386. PubMed ID: 31356113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Routine oblique radiography of the pediatric lumbar spine: is it necessary? Roberts FF; Kishore PR; Cunningham ME AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 Aug; 131(2):297-8. PubMed ID: 98011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Disc spaces, vertebral dimensions, and angle values at the lumbar region: a radioanatomical perspective in spines with L5-S1 transitions: clinical article. Mahato NK J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Oct; 15(4):371-9. PubMed ID: 21740126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of different technique factors on image quality of lumbar spine radiographs as evaluated by established CEC image criteria. Almén A; Tingberg A; Mattsson S; Besjakov J; Kheddache S; Lanhede B; Månsson LG; Zankl M Br J Radiol; 2000 Nov; 73(875):1192-9. PubMed ID: 11144797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The utility of dynamic flexion-extension radiographs in the initial evaluation of the degenerative lumbar spine. Hammouri QM; Haims AH; Simpson AK; Alqaqa A; Grauer JN Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Oct; 32(21):2361-4. PubMed ID: 17906579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of rigid vs. dynamic instrumentation for stabilization of the degenerative lumbosacral spine. Korovessis P; Papazisis Z; Lambiris E Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 91():457-61. PubMed ID: 15457776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dose implications of fluoroscopy-guided positioning (FGP) for lumbar spine examinations prior to acquiring plain film radiographs. Saunders M; Budden A; Maciver F; Teunis M; Warren-Forward H Br J Radiol; 2005 Feb; 78(926):130-4. PubMed ID: 15681324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of a full and empty bladder on radiation dose to the uterus, ovaries and bladder from lumbar spine CT and X-ray examinations. Nicholson R; Coucher J; Thornton A; Connor F Br J Radiol; 2000 Dec; 73(876):1290-6. PubMed ID: 11205673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]