These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6846460)

  • 1. Quantitation of glaucomatous visual field defects with the Mark II Friedmann analyzer.
    Hicks BC; Anderson DR
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1983 May; 95(5):692-700. PubMed ID: 6846460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dethecting glaucomatous damage with the Friedmann analyzer compared with te Goldmann perimeter and evaluation of stereoscopic photographs of the optic disk.
    Batko KA; Anctil JL; Anderson DR
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1983 Apr; 95(4):435-47. PubMed ID: 6837687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The screening of the central visual field.
    Krieglstein GK; Andrae K
    Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol; 1975; 193(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 1078956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A clinical comparison of visual field testing with a new automated perimeter, the Humphrey Field Analyzer, and the Goldmann perimeter.
    Beck RW; Bergstrom TJ; Lichter PR
    Ophthalmology; 1985 Jan; 92(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 3974997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peripheral visual field testing in glaucoma by automated kinetic perimetry with the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Ballon BJ; Echelman DA; Shields MB; Ollie AR
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1992 Dec; 110(12):1730-2. PubMed ID: 1463413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The limitations of kinetic perimetry in early scotoma detection.
    Portney GL; Krohn MA
    Ophthalmology; 1978 Mar; 85(3):287-93. PubMed ID: 662282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Color perimetry of glaucomatous visual field defects.
    Hart WM; Gordon MO
    Ophthalmology; 1984 Apr; 91(4):338-46. PubMed ID: 6717918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automated kinetic perimetry with two peripheral isopters in glaucoma.
    Miller KN; Shields MB; Ollie AR
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1989 Sep; 107(9):1316-20. PubMed ID: 2783064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the Friedmann Visual Field Analyser.
    Feldman F
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1975 Jul; 10(3):351-5. PubMed ID: 1148908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automatic perimetry (COMPETER). Ability to detect early glaucomatous field defects.
    Heijl A; Drance SM; Douglas GR
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1980 Sep; 98(9):1560-3. PubMed ID: 7425915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microperimetry--comparison between the micro perimeter 1 and scanning laser ophthalmoscope--fundus perimetry.
    Rohrschneider K; Springer C; Bültmann S; Völcker HE
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jan; 139(1):125-34. PubMed ID: 15672526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Computer perimetry of glaucomatous visual field defects at different stimulus sizes (author's transl)].
    Gramer E; Kontić D; Krieglstein GK
    Ophthalmologica; 1981; 183(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 7312301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Programmed visual field testing.
    Anderson DR
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 1982; 80():326-48. PubMed ID: 7182966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of Goldmann III, V and spatially equated test stimuli in visual field testing: the importance of complete and partial spatial summation.
    Phu J; Khuu SK; Zangerl B; Kalloniatis M
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Mar; 37(2):160-176. PubMed ID: 28211185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A clinical comparison of the Friedmann visual field analyser and tangent screen perimetry.
    Gutteridge IF
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1982 Feb; 59(2):184-94. PubMed ID: 7065111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Static vs dynamic visual field evaluation; with emphasis on the utility of the Friedmann Visual Field Analyzer.
    Yellen M; Sherman J
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1979 Jan; 50(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 762380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Peritest automatic perimeter in screening for glaucomatous visual field defects.
    Douglas GR
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1983 Dec; 18(7):318-20. PubMed ID: 6671150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A visual field screening protocol for glaucoma.
    Rabin S; Kolesar P; Podos SM; Wilensky JT
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1981 Oct; 92(4):630-5. PubMed ID: 7027800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Static versus kinetic testing in the nasal peripheral field in patients with glaucoma.
    Stewart WC
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1992 Feb; 70(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 1557979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Automated and semiautomated perimetry. Comparative trial of 3 devices (Baylor programmer, Friedmann Mark II campimeter, Octopus 2000 R.)].
    Pradines F; Delbosc B; Royer J
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1985; 8(2):173-85. PubMed ID: 3891833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.