These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6846495)

  • 1. The bead test: a critical appraisal.
    Richman JE; Garzia RP
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1983 Mar; 60(3):199-203. PubMed ID: 6846495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using the KM visual acuity chart for more reliable evaluation of amblyopia compared to the HVOT method.
    Moutakis K; Stigmar G; Hall-Lindberg J
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Oct; 82(5):547-51. PubMed ID: 15453851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The logMAR Kay picture test and the logMAR acuity test: a comparative study.
    Elliott MC; Firth AY
    Eye (Lond); 2009 Jan; 23(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 17901881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of tests to determine acuity deficits in children with amblyopia.
    Geer I; Westall CA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1996 Sep; 16(5):367-74. PubMed ID: 8944181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Landolt C and snellen e acuity: differences in strabismus amblyopia?].
    Becker R; Gräf M
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Jan; 223(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 16418930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the amblyopia treatment study HOTV and electronic-early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study visual acuity protocols in children aged 5 to 12 years.
    Rice ML; Leske DA; Holmes JM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Feb; 137(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 14962417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Resistance to occlusion: sensitivity to induced blur in 6- to 12-month-old infants.
    Fern KD; Manny RE; Burghart C
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1994 Sep; 65(9):651-9. PubMed ID: 7963225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of a computerised logMAR visual acuity measurement system (COMPlog): comparison with ETDRS and the electronic ETDRS testing algorithm in adults and amblyopic children.
    Laidlaw DA; Tailor V; Shah N; Atamian S; Harcourt C
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 92(2):241-4. PubMed ID: 17993577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [A new syllable text for evaluating near vision].
    Kolling GH; Höltzcke P
    Ophthalmologe; 1995 Feb; 92(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 7719078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Strabismus, amblyopia, and dyslexia.
    Gitschlag G; Scott WE
    Prim Care; 1982 Dec; 9(4):661-77. PubMed ID: 6925845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Evaluation of visual acuity in a historical cohort of 137 patients treated for amblyopia by occlusion 30-35 years ago].
    Simonsz-Tóth B; Loudon SE; van Kempen-du Saar H; van de Graaf ES; Groenewoud JH; Simonsz HJ
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2007 Jan; 224(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 17260318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparative assessment of visual acuity in preschoolers].
    Tatarinov SA; Dubovskaia LA; Kovalevskiĭ EI; Fil'chikova LI; Matveev SG
    Oftalmol Zh; 1988; (7):387-90. PubMed ID: 3237361
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preliminary report: examination of young children with Lea symbols.
    Becker RH; Hübsch SH; Gräf MH; Kaufmann H
    Strabismus; 2000 Sep; 8(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 11035563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preferential looking acuity obtained with a staircase procedure in pediatric patients.
    Mayer DL; Fulton AB; Hansen RM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1982 Oct; 23(4):538-43. PubMed ID: 7118510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of visual line acuity in humans.
    Hohmann A; Haase W
    Ophthalmic Res; 1982; 14(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 7088495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of strabismic amblyopia by small-sized concentric gratings in preverbal children.
    Tejedor J; Rodríguez JM
    Eye (Lond); 2008 Sep; 22(9):1110-6. PubMed ID: 17479119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving the reliability of visual acuity measures in young children.
    McGraw PV; Winn B; Gray LS; Elliott DB
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2000 May; 20(3):173-84. PubMed ID: 10897339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Preliminary note on the application to amblyopia of the dynamic exploration of visual acuity].
    Bessière E; Rougier-Houssin ; Quinton ; Verin P
    Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr; 1965 Nov; 65(11):1036-40. PubMed ID: 5866220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the amblyopia treatment study HOTV and electronic-early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study visual acuity protocols in children aged 5 to 12 years.
    Brown SM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Sep; 138(3):512; author reply 512-3. PubMed ID: 15364255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computer-based test to measure optimal visual acuity in age-related macular degeneration.
    González EG; Tarita-Nistor L; Markowitz SN; Steinbach MJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Oct; 48(10):4838-45. PubMed ID: 17898311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.