These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

55 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6849059)

  • 1. A quality assurance protocol for CT scanners.
    Droege RT
    Radiology; 1983 Jan; 146(1):244-6. PubMed ID: 6849059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A proposed protocol for acceptance and constancy control of computed tomography systems: a Nordic Association for Clinical Physics (NACP) work group report.
    Kuttner S; Bujila R; Kortesniemi M; Andersson H; Kull L; Østerås BH; Thygesen J; Tarp IS
    Acta Radiol; 2013 Mar; 54(2):188-98. PubMed ID: 23160544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of a dynamic quality assurance testing protocol for multisite clinical trial DCE-CT accreditation.
    Driscoll B; Keller H; Jaffray D; Coolens C
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081906. PubMed ID: 23927320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality assurance for abdominal CT: a rapid, computer-assisted technique.
    Pomerantz SM; Daly B; Krebs TL; NessAiver M; Kepes SY; Wong JJ; Severson M; Siegler C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Nov; 167(5):1141-5. PubMed ID: 8911167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A quality-assurance program for mobile CT scanners.
    Padikal TN
    Appl Radiol; 1987 Feb; 16(2):18-20, 25, 61. PubMed ID: 10280639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interphantom and interscanner variations for Hounsfield units--establishment of reference values for HU in a commercial QA phantom.
    Sande EP; Martinsen AC; Hole EO; Olerud HM
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Sep; 55(17):5123-35. PubMed ID: 20714048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sophisticated test objects for the quality assurance of optical computed tomography scanners.
    Abdul Rahman AT; Bräuer-Krisch E; Brochard T; Adamovics J; Clowes SK; Bradley D; Doran SJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jul; 56(14):4177-99. PubMed ID: 21701054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality assurance in CT with the Belgian protocol and the new European acceptability criteria.
    Bosmans H; Lemmens K; Malone J; Oyen R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Feb; 153(2):197-205. PubMed ID: 23233502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance evaluation and quality assurance of computed tomography scanners, with illustrations from the EMI, ACTA, and Delta scanners.
    McCullough EC; Payne JT; Baker HL; Hattery RR; Sheedy PF; Stephens DH; Gedgaudus E
    Radiology; 1976 Jul; 120(1):173-88. PubMed ID: 935444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new phantom for evaluation of low-contrast detectability of X-ray CT scanner.
    Endo M; Iinuma TA; Takenaka E; Inoue M
    Radiat Med; 1984; 2(3):176-80. PubMed ID: 6543966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. CT radiation dose and image quality.
    Payne JT
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2005 Nov; 43(6):953-62, vii. PubMed ID: 16253656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Data-driven CT protocol review and management—experience from a large academic hospital.
    Zhang D; Savage CA; Li X; Liu B
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Mar; 12(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 25577405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acceptance testing of medical imaging equipment: CT and MRI.
    Padikal TN
    Appl Radiol; 1987 Nov; 16(11):57, 60-4. PubMed ID: 10285160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A practical method to routinely monitor resolution in digital images.
    Droege RT
    Med Phys; 1983; 10(3):337-43. PubMed ID: 6877181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sensitivity and daily quality control of a mobile PET/CT scanner operating in 3-dimensional mode.
    Belakhlef A; Church C; Fraser R; Lakhanpal S
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2007 Dec; 35(4):229-31. PubMed ID: 18006593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Evaluation of the performance of 8 computerized tomographs in clinical use in Italy].
    Pinto I; de Denaro M; Giribona P; Giuricin C; Bravar D
    Radiol Med; 1988 Sep; 76(3):210-6. PubMed ID: 3175074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiographic quality control devices.
    Health Devices; 2000 Apr; 29(4):97-139. PubMed ID: 11002439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality assurance in CT.
    Stein KM
    Radiol Technol; 2000; 72(1):67. PubMed ID: 11019412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality assurance of radiation therapy planning systems: current status and remaining challenges.
    Van Dyk J
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008; 71(1 Suppl):S23-7. PubMed ID: 18406932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The unreliability of CT numbers as absolute values.
    Levi C; Gray JE; McCullough EC; Hattery RR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Sep; 139(3):443-7. PubMed ID: 6981306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.