These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6849083)
21. Screen-film and digital mammography. Image quality and radiation dose considerations. Haus AG; Yaffe MJ Radiol Clin North Am; 2000 Jul; 38(4):871-98. PubMed ID: 10943284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [A bimetal anode with tungsten or rhodium? Comparative studies on image quality and dosage requirement in mammography]. Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Moritz J; Müller D; Grabbe E Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 8527751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of mammographic screen-film systems. Sickles EA Recent Results Cancer Res; 1987; 105():52-7. PubMed ID: 3589132 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Modification of an automatic exposure control system for mammography to accommodate multiple-speed, screen-film systems. Rossi RP; Williams C; Gill D AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Oct; 151(4):685-6. PubMed ID: 3262269 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. [Experimental study on image quality when using screens in mammography (author's transl)]. Maurer HJ; Goos F Rofo; 1979 Mar; 130(3):347-51. PubMed ID: 155580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Screen-film mammographic technique for breast cancer screening. Stanton L; Day JL; Villafana T; Miller CH; Lightfoot DA Radiology; 1987 May; 163(2):471-9. PubMed ID: 3562829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Characteristics of x-ray intensifying screens for mammography]. Gorelik FG; Kon'kova GV Med Tekh; 1985; (1):48-51. PubMed ID: 3974436 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [Direct digital magnification mammography with a large-surface detector made of amorphous silicon]. Hermann KP; Hundertmark C; Funke M; von Brenndorff A; Grabbe E Rofo; 1999 May; 170(5):503-6. PubMed ID: 10370416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Comparison of various radiation collectors for use in mammography]. Gurvich AM; Katomina RV; Petrova IIu; Rozhkova NI; Smekhov ME Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1983; (1):67-74. PubMed ID: 6845647 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Absorbed breast dose: dependence on radiographic modality and technique, and breast thickness. Skubic SE; Fatouros PP Radiology; 1986 Oct; 161(1):263-70. PubMed ID: 3763877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. High-contrast mammography with a moving grid: assessment of clinical utility. Sickles EA; Weber WN AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Jun; 146(6):1137-9. PubMed ID: 3518365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Examinations of rare-earth film-screen-systems for image detectors in mammography (author's transl)]. Weberling R Rontgenblatter; 1979 Mar; 32(3):109-16. PubMed ID: 432483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Mammography using an ultrahigh-strip-density, stationary, focused grid. Dershaw DD; Masterson ME; Malik S; Cruz NM Radiology; 1985 Aug; 156(2):541-4. PubMed ID: 4011922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Sensitivity of radiographic screens to scattered radiation and its relationship to image contrast. Castle JW Radiology; 1977 Mar; 122(3):805-9. PubMed ID: 841075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Use of grids in mammography]. Cervi PM; Campanati A; Orzincolo C; Droghetti M Radiol Med; 1987 Mar; 73(3):228-32. PubMed ID: 3562924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Clinical evaluation of a new set of image quality criteria for mammography. Grahn A; Hemdal B; Andersson I; Ruschin M; Thilander-Klang A; Börjesson S; Tingberg A; Mattsson S; Håkansson M; Båth M; Månsson LG; Medin J; Wanninger F; Panzer W Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):389-94. PubMed ID: 15933143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Optimizing techniques in screen-film mammography. Hendrick RE; Berns EA Radiol Clin North Am; 2000 Jul; 38(4):701-18, viii. PubMed ID: 10943272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]