158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6849208)
1. Double-blind comparison of metronidazole plus gentamicin and clindamycin plus gentamicin in intra-abdominal infection.
Kirkpatrick JR; Anderson BJ; Louie JJ; Stiver HG
Surgery; 1983 Jan; 93(1 Pt 2):215-6. PubMed ID: 6849208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective, randomized comparison of metronidazole and clindamycin, each with gentamicin, for the treatment of serious intra-abdominal infection.
Surgery; 1983 Jan; 93(1 Pt 2):221-9. PubMed ID: 6849209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized controlled trial of ampicillin plus sulbactam vs. gentamicin plus clindamycin in the treatment of intraabdominal infections: a preliminary report. Study Group of Intraabdominal Infections.
Rev Infect Dis; 1986; 8 Suppl 5():S583-8. PubMed ID: 2879345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clindamycin versus metronidazole in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis.
Greaves WL; Chungafung J; Morris B; Haile A; Townsend JL
Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Nov; 72(5):799-802. PubMed ID: 3050654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Randomized study of minocycline + gentamicin compared with metronidazole + gentamicin for prophylaxis or treatment of mixed infections in abdominal surgery.
Legrand JC; Van der Auwera P; Renaux J; Bailly A; Van Eukem P; Chastel C
Int J Clin Pharmacol Res; 1986; 6(5):361-8. PubMed ID: 3781699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficacy of dactimicin plus clindamycin compared with gentamicin plus clindamycin in the treatment of experimental intra-abdominal infections in rats.
Nord CE; Lahnborg G
Drugs Exp Clin Res; 1990; 16(8):403-6. PubMed ID: 2097144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Results of the North American trial of piperacillin/tazobactam compared with clindamycin and gentamicin in the treatment of severe intra-abdominal infections. Investigators of the Piperacillin/Tazobactam Intra-abdominal Infection Study Group.
Eur J Surg Suppl; 1994; (573):61-6. PubMed ID: 7524798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of metronidazole and clindamycin for the treatment of intra-abdominal anaerobic infection: a multicentre trial.
Van der Auwera P; Collier J; Goris RJ; Saario I; Willis AT
J Antimicrob Chemother; 1982 Jul; 10(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 7050070
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Piperacillin/tazobactam in comparison with clindamycin plus gentamicin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.
Shyr YM; Lui WY; Su CH; Wang LS; Liu CY
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 1995 Aug; 56(2):102-8. PubMed ID: 7553416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Short-term prevention with clindamycin and gentamicin in abdominal surgery. Randomized study].
Ferrari G; Di Palo S; Braga M; Carlucci M; Chiesa R; Cristallo M; Staudacher C; Di Carlo V
Minerva Chir; 1983 Jul 15-31; 38(13-14):1089-94. PubMed ID: 6633896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Randomised comparative efficacy of clindamycin, metronidazole, and lincomycin, plus gentamicin in chronic suppurative otitis media.
Rotimi VO; Olabiyi DA; Banjo TO; Okeowo PA
West Afr J Med; 1990; 9(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 2268574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of metronidazole and tobramycin with clindamycin and tobramycin in the treatment of intra-abdominal sepsis.
Smith JA; Skidmore AG; Forward AD; Clarke AM; Sutherland E
Ann Surg; 1980 Aug; 192(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 6996625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Twice-daily moxalactam versus gentamicin and clindamycin in patients with penetrating abdominal trauma.
Crots LD; Obeid FN; Horst HM; Bivins BA
Clin Pharm; 1985; 4(3):316-20. PubMed ID: 3891203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A prospective randomized study of moxalactam versus gentamicin and clindamycin in penetrating abdominal trauma.
Kreis DJ; Augenstein D; Martinez O; Echenique M; Plasencia G; Vopal JJ; Byers P; Gomez GA
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1986 Jul; 163(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 3726718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A multicentre comparison of clindamycin and metronidazole in the treatment of anaerobic infections.
Collier J; Colhoun EM; Hill PL
Scand J Infect Dis Suppl; 1981; 26():96-100. PubMed ID: 6941465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical comparison of cefotaxime versus the combination of gentamicin plus clindamycin in the treatment of polymicrobial soft-tissue surgical sepsis.
Strom PR; Geheber CE; Morris ES; Stone HH
Clin Ther; 1982; 5 Suppl A():26-31. PubMed ID: 6293715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prospective, randomized, comparative trials in the therapy for intraabdominal and female genital tract infections.
Harding GK; Nicolle LE; Haase DA; Aoki FY; Stiver HG; Blanchard RJ; Kirkpatrick JR
Rev Infect Dis; 1984; 6 Suppl 1():S283-92. PubMed ID: 6326244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical evaluation of cefotaxime versus gentamicin plus clindamycin in the treatment of polymicrobial peritonitis.
Stone HH; Geheber CE; Kolb LD; Strom PR
Clin Ther; 1982; 5 Suppl A():1-9. PubMed ID: 6293712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clindamycin versus metronidazole in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis.
Bignardi GE
Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Aug; 74(2):281-2. PubMed ID: 2748067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Current experience with clindamycin in the treatment of abdominal and female pelvic infections.
Gorbach SL
Scand J Infect Dis Suppl; 1984; 43():82-8. PubMed ID: 6398909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
