These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6851660)

  • 1. A rapid cell culture technique for assessing the toxicity of detergent-based products in vitro as a possible screen for eye irritancy in vivo.
    Kemp RB; Meredith RW; Gamble S; Frost M
    Cytobios; 1983; 36(143-44):153-9. PubMed ID: 6851660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Confocal microscopic characterization of initial corneal changes of surfactant-induced eye irritation in the rabbit.
    Maurer JK; Li HF; Petroll WM; Parker RD; Cavanagh HD; Jester JV
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 1997 Apr; 143(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 9144446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Human hemoglobin denaturation as an alternative to the Draize test for predicting eye irritancy of surfactants.
    Mitjans M; Infante MR; Vinardell MP
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Nov; 52(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 18602964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An in vitro cytotoxicity test to predict the ocular irritation potential of detergents and detergent products.
    Scaife MC
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1985 Feb; 23(2):253-8. PubMed ID: 4040073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro methods: their relevance and complementarity in ocular safety assessment.
    Rougier A; Cottin M; de Silva O; Roguet R; Catroux P; Toufic A; Dossou KG
    Lens Eye Toxic Res; 1992; 9(3-4):229-45. PubMed ID: 1301783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of eye and skin irritation of arginine-derivative surfactants using different in vitro endpoints as alternatives to the in vivo assays.
    Martinez V; Corsini E; Mitjans M; Pinazo A; Vinardell MP
    Toxicol Lett; 2006 Jul; 164(3):259-67. PubMed ID: 16472949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Eye irritation of low-irritant cosmetic formulations: correlation of in vitro results with clinical data and product composition.
    Debbasch C; Ebenhahn C; Dami N; Pericoi M; Van den Berghe C; Cottin M; Nohynek GJ
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2005 Jan; 43(1):155-65. PubMed ID: 15582208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An alternative test battery in detecting ocular irritancy of agrochemicals.
    Tavaszi J; Budai P; Pálovics A; Kismányoki A
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):891-5. PubMed ID: 19226840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of a human corneal epithelial cell line as an in vitro model for assessing ocular irritation.
    Kruszewski FH; Walker TL; DiPasquale LC
    Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1997 Apr; 36(2):130-40. PubMed ID: 9143482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Participation of the membrane effect to the cytotoxicity of tensio-active agents comparison with ocular irritation in vivo.
    Conduzorgues J; Hagege M; Dumas M; Meybeck A
    Lens Eye Toxic Res; 1989; 6(1-2):375-8. PubMed ID: 2488030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Area and depth of surfactant-induced corneal injury predicts extent of subsequent ocular responses.
    Jester JV; Petroll WM; Bean J; Parker RD; Carr GJ; Cavanagh HD; Maurer JK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1998 Dec; 39(13):2610-25. PubMed ID: 9856771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction of the eye irritation potential of shampoos using the in vitro SIRC cell toxicity test.
    North-Root H; Yackovich F; Demetrulias J; Gacula M; Heinze JE
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1985 Feb; 23(2):271-3. PubMed ID: 4040076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative measurement of acute corneal injury in rabbits with surfactants of different type and irritancy.
    Maurer JK; Parker RD; Petroll WM; Carr GJ; Cavanagh HD; Jester JV
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 1999 Jul; 158(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 10387933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determination of the intra- and interlaboratory reproducibility of the low volume eye test and its statistical relationship to the Draize eye test.
    Cormier EM; Parker RD; Henson C; Cruse LW; Merritt AK; Bruce RD; Osborne R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1996 Apr; 23(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 8661334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Cytotoxicity of chemicals used in household products: estimation of eye irritating potency of 25 chemicals tested during 1991-1996].
    Ikarashi Y; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A
    Kokuritsu Iyakuhin Shokuhin Eisei Kenkyusho Hokoku; 1997; (115):130-4. PubMed ID: 9641827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Area and depth of surfactant-induced corneal injury correlates with cell death.
    Jester JV; Li HF; Petroll WM; Parker RD; Cavanagh HD; Carr GJ; Smith B; Maurer JK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1998 May; 39(6):922-36. PubMed ID: 9579472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative study of red blood cell method in rat and calves blood as alternatives of Draize eye irritation test.
    Lagarto A; Vega R; Vega Y; Guerra I; González R
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2006 Jun; 20(4):529-33. PubMed ID: 16293391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of HET-CAM test in detecting the ocular irritation.
    Tavaszi J; Budai P
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2007; 72(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 18399434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of in vitro cell toxicity with in vivo eye irritation.
    Bracher M; Faller C; Spengler J; Reinhardt CA
    Mol Toxicol; 1987-1988 Fall; 1(4):561-70. PubMed ID: 3509702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of the red blood cell test system as in vitro assay for the rapid screening of irritation potential of surfactants.
    Pape WJ; Pfannenbecker U; Hoppe U
    Mol Toxicol; 1987-1988 Fall; 1(4):525-36. PubMed ID: 3509700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.