168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6852401)
1. Refusing medical treatment: incompetent adults.
Barnes G
Dimens Health Serv; 1983 Apr; 60(4):26-7, 29-30. PubMed ID: 6852401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. More on appropriate decision making for the terminally ill incompetent patient.
Norris JA
Am J Law Med; 1979; 5(2):i-vi. PubMed ID: 507059
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Treatment of incompetent terminally ill patients. 1. The American experience.
Thomson CJ
Med J Aust; 1982 Feb; 1(4):188-90. PubMed ID: 7078492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Medical ethics after Quinlan: guidelines and the ethics of dying.
Hudson RP
J Kans Med Soc; 1982 Jul; 83(7):371-5, 340. PubMed ID: 7119537
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The medical futility debate continues.
Struthers MS; Olson BC
Minn Med; 1995 Feb; 78(2):29-32. PubMed ID: 7891646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Refusing treatment for incompetent patients; why Quinlan and Saikewicz cases agree on roles of guardians, physicians, judges, and ethics committees.
Annas GJ
N Y State J Med; 1980 Apr; 80(5):816-21. PubMed ID: 6930563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Help from the dead: the cases of Brother Fox and John Storar.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1981 Jun; 11(3):19-20. PubMed ID: 7239891
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The fusion of medicine and law for in extremis health and medical decisions: does it produce energy and light or just cosmic debris?
Bellacosa JW
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1990; 18(1):5-21. PubMed ID: 2328334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The Saikewicz precedent: what's good for an incompetent patient?
Ramsey P
Hastings Cent Rep; 1978 Dec; 8(6):36-42. PubMed ID: 152738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Profoundly diminished life. The casualties of coercion.
Morreim EH
Hastings Cent Rep; 1994; 24(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 8045768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Equality for the elderly incompetent: a proposal for dignified death.
Merritt TL
Stanford Law Rev; 1987 Feb; 39(3):689-736. PubMed ID: 10281165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. When is medical treatment "futile"?
Bennett AJ
Issues Law Med; 1993; 9(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 8354625
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Death by default.
Lindgren J
Law Contemp Probl; 1993; 56(3):185-254. PubMed ID: 10129268
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The discontinuation of "extraordinary" medical treatment from a terminal patient: a physician's civil liability in New York.
Giancola PJ
Med Trial Tech Q; 1980; 26(3):326-54. PubMed ID: 6155590
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The next Wanglie case: the problems of litigating medical ethics.
Mishkin DB
J Clin Ethics; 1991; 2(4):282-5; discussion 285-6. PubMed ID: 1804399
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Substituted judgment doctrine: a critical analysis.
Weber WM
Issues Law Med; 1985 Sep; 1(2):131-56. PubMed ID: 3850085
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. What is extraordinary life support?
Jonsen AR
West J Med; 1984 Sep; 141(3):358-63. PubMed ID: 6506674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Who speaks for incompetent patients? The case of Joseph Saikewicz.
Carroll PR
Trustee; 1978 Dec; 31(12):19, 21-2, 24. PubMed ID: 10239592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The best interests of incompetent patients: the capacity for interpersonal relationships as a standard for decisionmaking.
Quinn KP
Calif Law Rev; 1988 Jul; 76(4):897-937. PubMed ID: 11650115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. "Pulling the plug": are you ready to make the decision?
Ginsburg WH
Physicians Manage; 1985 Mar; 25(3):349-51, 354, 357-60 passim. PubMed ID: 10270469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
