These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6855914)

  • 1. Testing for carcinogenicity and the problem of pseudocarcinogenicity.
    Roe FJ
    Nature; 1983 Jun 23-29; 303(5919):657-8. PubMed ID: 6855914
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Current status of the problem of testing drugs for carcinogenicity].
    Shashkina LF; Ivanova VM; Liubimov BI
    Farmakol Toksikol; 1985; 48(3):107-13. PubMed ID: 3896842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rodent carcinogenicity testing.
    Barr JT
    Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1986 Aug; 7(2):354-7. PubMed ID: 3758553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The implant test. Six tests for carcinogenicity.
    Longstaff E
    Br J Cancer; 1978 Jun; 37(6):954-9. PubMed ID: 678434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Incorporation of transplacental exposure into routine carcinogenicity bioassays.
    Swenberg JA
    Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1979 May; (51):265-8. PubMed ID: 481580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Possible methods of carcinogenicity testing for substances used at the place of work.
    Steinhoff D
    Cancer Detect Prev; 1981; 4(1-4):41-6. PubMed ID: 7349803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Procedures for screening chemicals for carcinogenicity.
    Purchase IF
    Br J Ind Med; 1980 Feb; 37(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 6989387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Design of cancer assays for pharmaceutical agents: a reply.
    Boorman GA; Huff JE; Schwetz BA
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1986 Aug; 77(2):589-90. PubMed ID: 3461218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experimental tumours and their counterparts in man: some similarities and differences.
    Carter RL
    Br J Cancer; 1980 Mar; 41(3):494. PubMed ID: 7387840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ranking animal carcinogens: a proposed regulatory approach.
    Squire RA
    Science; 1981 Nov; 214(4523):877-80. PubMed ID: 7302565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The carcinogenic and anticarcinogenic properties of neozon D].
    Pliss GB; Vlasov NN; Zabezhinskiĭ MA
    Vopr Onkol; 1991; 37(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 2014680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Will all chemicals be carcinogenic to rodents when adequately evaluated?
    Ashby J; Purchase IF
    Mutagenesis; 1993 Nov; 8(6):489-93. PubMed ID: 8133777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Studies on the mechanism of the synergistic carcinogenic response reported between ethylene and disulfiram and the implications for short term predictive screening tests.
    Elliott BM; Ashby J
    Dev Toxicol Environ Sci; 1980; 8():193-6. PubMed ID: 7030702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of chemical carcinogenicity from in vitro genetic toxicity.
    Heddle JA
    Mutagenesis; 1988 Jul; 3(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 3062315
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comment on methodology and interpretation of results.
    Tomatis L
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1977 Nov; 59(5):1341-2. PubMed ID: 909094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical issues in interpretation of chronic bioassay tests for carcinogenicity.
    Gart JJ; Chu KC; Tarone RE
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1979 Apr; 62(4):957-74. PubMed ID: 285297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. British Association for Cancer Research. Chemical carcinogenesis: predictive value of carcinogenicity studies. 30-31 August, 1979, at the University of Surrey, Guildford. (Synopses of invited papers).
    Br J Cancer; 1980 Mar; 41(3):489-508. PubMed ID: 6104502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative results of 327 chemical carcinogenicity studies.
    Haseman JK; Huff JE; Zeiger E; McConnell EE
    Environ Health Perspect; 1987 Oct; 74():229-35. PubMed ID: 3691430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The predictive value of rodent carcinogenicity tests in the evaluation of human risks.
    Tomatis L
    Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol; 1979; 19():511-30. PubMed ID: 378109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mouse-specific carcinogens: an assessment of hazard and significance for validation of short-term carcinogenicity bioassays in transgenic mice.
    Battershill JM; Fielder RJ
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 1998 Apr; 17(4):193-205. PubMed ID: 9617631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.