These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6856789)

  • 1. [Principles of a new concept for the estimation of radiation burden and risk to patients in radiologic examinations].
    Tautz M
    Radiobiol Radiother (Berl); 1983; 24(1):109-19. PubMed ID: 6856789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Estimating patient dose in radiologic examinations using conversion factors].
    Neumann K; Lemke AJ; Hosten N; Keske U
    Radiologe; 1995 Mar; 35(3):171-81. PubMed ID: 7761593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiation safety and protection of neonates in radiological examinations.
    Yoshizumi TT; Drummond KT; Freeman JO; Mullett MD
    Radiol Technol; 1987; 58(5):405-8. PubMed ID: 3588883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The imaging imperative meets concerns about radiation exposure.
    Hillman BJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 May; 4(5):265-6. PubMed ID: 17467605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comments on 'Increasing film-focus distance (FFD) reduces radiation dose for X-ray examinations' by P.C. Brennan, S. McDonnell and D. O'Leary.
    Huda W; Ogden KM; Brennan PC; O'Leary D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(4):453-5. PubMed ID: 15769801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Safer radiologic examinations].
    Staniszewska MA; Jankowski J
    Med Pr; 1994; 45(6):529-36. PubMed ID: 7854111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Aspects of operational radiation protection during dismantling of nuclear facilities relevant for the estimation of internal doses.
    Labarta T
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 124(3):260-5. PubMed ID: 17951606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Estimating patient dosage in radiologic examinations. Effective doses of the most frequent roentgen examinations].
    Keske U; Hierholzer J; Neumann K; Cordes M; Venz S; Amthauer H; Matschke S; Felix R
    Radiologe; 1995 Mar; 35(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 7761592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Software for the estimation of organ equivalent and effective doses from diagnostic radiology procedures.
    Osei EK; Barnett R
    J Radiol Prot; 2009 Sep; 29(3):361-76. PubMed ID: 19690363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Reduction of patient exposure in routine x-ray examinations].
    Koga S; Naito Y; Sawada T
    Rinsho Hoshasen; 1975 Jan; 20(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 1169409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [X-ray examinations in Norway--optimized use of radiation and radiation protection].
    Olerud HM
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Apr; 119(9):1322-5. PubMed ID: 10327857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiation protection. Protection from potential exposures: application to selected radiation sources. A report of a task group of the International Commission on Radiation Protection.
    Ann ICRP; 1997; 27(2):1-61. PubMed ID: 9313827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Basic concepts on protection in nuclear medicine].
    Nogueira A
    Rev Port Cardiol; 1994 May; 13 Suppl 3():13-20. PubMed ID: 8060652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patient dose measurements in diagnostic radiology procedures in Korea.
    Kim YH; Choi JH; Kim CK; Kim JM; Kim SS; Oh YW; Lee CY; Kang DH; Lee YB; Cho PK; Kim HC; Kim CM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 123(4):540-5. PubMed ID: 17223642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The CASL Study: Dose reduction in a computed radiography environment.
    Gregoire S
    Radiol Technol; 2006; 78(2):160-3. PubMed ID: 17119181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Concept of optimisation of the radiation protection system in the nuclear sector: management of individual cancer risks and providing targeted health care.
    Ivanov VK; Tsyb AF; Agapov AM; Panfilov AP; Kaidalov OV; Gorski AI; Maksioutov MA; Suspitsin YV; Vaizer VI
    J Radiol Prot; 2006 Dec; 26(4):361-74. PubMed ID: 17146121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiation doses from some common paediatric X-ray examinations in Sudan.
    Suliman II; Elshiekh EH
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 132(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 18765402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. First results on patient dose measurements from conventional diagnostic radiology procedures in Serbia and Montenegro.
    Ciraj O; Marković S; Kosutić D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(3):330-5. PubMed ID: 15755772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adult reference levels in diagnostic and interventional radiology for temporary use in Switzerland.
    Aroua A; Besançon A; Buchillier-Decka I; Trueb P; Valley JF; Verdun FR; Zeller W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(3):289-95. PubMed ID: 15266081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Use of radiopharmaceuticals, radiation burden and radiation risks in examination procedures in nuclear medicine].
    Husák V; Petrová K; Masopust J; Myslivecek M
    Cas Lek Cesk; 1999 May; 138(11):323-8. PubMed ID: 10422342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.