BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6857550)

  • 1. Sexual selection and fertility.
    O'Donald P
    Theor Popul Biol; 1983 Feb; 23(1):64-84. PubMed ID: 6857550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Frequency-dependent sexual selection.
    O'Donald P; Majerus ME
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1988 Jul; 319(1196):571-86. PubMed ID: 2905493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A general analysis of genetic models with frequency-dependent mating. II. Sexual selection for heterozygotes.
    St Lawrence I; O'Donald P
    Heredity (Edinb); 1981 Aug; 47(Pt 1):63-77. PubMed ID: 7275680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A symmetric two-locus fertility model.
    Feldman MW; Liberman U
    Genetics; 1985 Jan; 109(1):229-53. PubMed ID: 3967817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evolutionary principles for general frequency-dependent two-phenotype models in sexual populations.
    Lessard S
    J Theor Biol; 1986 Apr; 119(3):329-44. PubMed ID: 3736075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Regions of stable equilibria for models of differential selection in the two sexes under random mating.
    Kidwell JF; Clegg MT; Stewart FM; Prout T
    Genetics; 1977 Jan; 85(1):171-83. PubMed ID: 838269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Population genetic models of male and mutual mate choice.
    Servedio MR; Lande R
    Evolution; 2006 Apr; 60(4):674-85. PubMed ID: 16739450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative genetic models of female choice based on "arbitrary" male characters.
    Heisler IL
    Heredity (Edinb); 1985 Oct; 55 ( Pt 2)():187-98. PubMed ID: 4055415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assortative mate choice and dominance modification: alternative ways of removing heterozygote disadvantage.
    Durinx M; Van Dooren TJ
    Evolution; 2009 Feb; 63(2):334-52. PubMed ID: 19054051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Models of sexual selection on a quantitative genetic trait when preference is acquired by sexual imprinting.
    Aoki K; Feldman MW; Kerr B
    Evolution; 2001 Jan; 55(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 11263743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sexual conflict and speciation.
    Parker GA; Partridge L
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1998 Feb; 353(1366):261-74. PubMed ID: 9533125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Male mate choice, male quality, and the potential for sexual selection on female traits under polygyny.
    Fitzpatrick CL; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2017 Jan; 71(1):174-183. PubMed ID: 27804119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mating advantage of rare males in models of sexual selection.
    O'Donald P
    Nature; 1977 May; 267(5607):151-4. PubMed ID: 16073426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Frequency-dependent and correlational selection pressures have conflicting consequences for assortative mating in a color-polymorphic lizard, Uta stansburiana.
    Lancaster LT; McAdam AG; Hipsley CA; Sinervo BR
    Am Nat; 2014 Aug; 184(2):188-97. PubMed ID: 25058279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sperm competition games: sperm selection by females.
    Ball MA; Parker GA
    J Theor Biol; 2003 Sep; 224(1):27-42. PubMed ID: 12900202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sexual selection and mating advantages in the giant sperm species, Drosophila bifurca.
    Luck N; Joly D
    J Insect Sci; 2005; 5():10. PubMed ID: 16299600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The evolution of mate choice in a fluctuating environment.
    Charlesworth B
    J Theor Biol; 1988 Jan; 130(2):191-204. PubMed ID: 3419180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evolution of mating preference and sexual dimorphism.
    Lande R; Arnold SJ
    J Theor Biol; 1985 Dec; 117(4):651-64. PubMed ID: 4094458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selection in complex genetic systems. I. The symmetric equilibria of the three-locus symmetric viability model.
    Feldman MW; Franklin I; Thomson GJ
    Genetics; 1974 Jan; 76(1):135-62. PubMed ID: 4818262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The costs of choice in sexual selection.
    Pomiankowski A
    J Theor Biol; 1987 Sep; 128(2):195-218. PubMed ID: 3431135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.