BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

384 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6860094)

  • 1. Arm crank vs handrim wheelchair propulsion: metabolic and cardiopulmonary responses.
    Smith PA; Glaser RM; Petrofsky JS; Underwood PD; Smith GB; Richard JJ
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1983 Jun; 64(6):249-54. PubMed ID: 6860094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Physiological response to the ambulatory performance of hand-rim and arm-crank propulsion systems.
    Mukherjee G; Samanta A
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2001; 38(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 11563492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Metabolic and heart rate responses to submaximal arm lever and arm crank ergometry.
    Gangelhoff J; Cordain L; Tucker A; Sockler J
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1988 Feb; 69(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 3341886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Energy cost and cardiopulmonary responses for wheelchair locomotion and walking on tile and on carpet.
    Glaser RM; Sawka MN; Wilde SW; Woodrow BK; Suryaprasad AG
    Paraplegia; 1981; 19(4):220-6. PubMed ID: 7290731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of steering on the physiological energy cost of wheelchair propulsion.
    Reid M; Lawrie AT; Hunter J; Warren PM
    Scand J Rehabil Med; 1990; 22(3):139-43. PubMed ID: 2244191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Methodology devised for a program to improve efficiency and reduce risks for wheelchair locomotion.
    Glaser RM; Suryaprasad AG; Sawka MN; Fichtenbaum BM
    Bull Prosthet Res; 1981; 10-35():63-8. PubMed ID: 7332837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of handrim diameter on manual wheelchair propulsion: mechanical energy and power flow analysis.
    Guo LY; Su FC; An KN
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Feb; 21(2):107-15. PubMed ID: 16226359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validity of power output estimation for wheelchair locomotion.
    Glaser RM; Collins SR
    Am J Phys Med; 1981 Aug; 60(4):180-9. PubMed ID: 7270661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Circulatory and metabolic responses of women to arm crank and wheelchair ergometry.
    Sedlock DA; Knowlton RG; Fitzgerald PI
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1990 Feb; 71(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 2302053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Thermoregulatory and physiological responses of wheelchair athletes to prolonged arm crank and wheelchair exercise.
    Price MJ; Campbell IG
    Int J Sports Med; 1999 Oct; 20(7):457-63. PubMed ID: 10551341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Degree of coordination between breathing and rhythmic arm movements during hand rim wheelchair propulsion.
    Fabre N; Perrey S; Arbez L; Ruiz J; Tordi N; Rouillon JD
    Int J Sports Med; 2006 Jan; 27(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 16388445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of handrim velocity on mechanical efficiency in wheelchair propulsion.
    Veeger HE; van der Woude LH; Rozendal RH
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1992 Jan; 24(1):100-7. PubMed ID: 1548983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Oxygen consumption of elderly persons with bilateral below knee amputations: ambulation vs wheelchair propulsion.
    DuBow LL; Witt PL; Kadaba MP; Reyes R; Cochran V
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1983 Jun; 64(6):255-9. PubMed ID: 6860095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Wheelchair propulsion kinematics in beginners and expert users: influence of wheelchair settings.
    Gorce P; Louis N
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Jan; 27(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 21840091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficiency of wheelchair propulsion and effects of strategy.
    Lenton JP; Fowler N; van der Woude L; Goosey-Tolfrey VL
    Int J Sports Med; 2008 May; 29(5):384-9. PubMed ID: 17879885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of chronic use of different propulsion systems in wheelchair design on the aerobic capacity of Indian users.
    Mukherjee G; Bhowmik P; Samanta A
    Indian J Med Res; 2005 Jun; 121(6):747-58. PubMed ID: 16037619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new procedure to determine external power output during handrim wheelchair propulsion on a roller ergometer: a reliability study.
    Theisen D; Francaux M; Fayt A; Sturbois X
    Int J Sports Med; 1996 Nov; 17(8):564-71. PubMed ID: 8973976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A physiological comparison of forward vs reverse wheelchair ergometry.
    Linden AL; Holland GJ; Loy SF; Vincent WJ
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1993 Nov; 25(11):1265-8. PubMed ID: 8289614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stroke pattern and handrim biomechanics for level and uphill wheelchair propulsion at self-selected speeds.
    Richter WM; Rodriguez R; Woods KR; Axelson PW
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Jan; 88(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 17207680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Metabolic and circulatory responses to wheelchair and arm crank exercise.
    Sawka MN; Glaser RM; Wilde SW; von Luhrte TC
    J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol; 1980 Nov; 49(5):784-8. PubMed ID: 6776077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.