These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6860761)

  • 21. The mechanical characteristics and in vitro biocompatibility of poly(glycerol sebacate)-bioglass elastomeric composites.
    Liang SL; Cook WD; Thouas GA; Chen QZ
    Biomaterials; 2010 Nov; 31(33):8516-29. PubMed ID: 20739061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Bioactivity, cytocompatibility and thermal properties of experimental Bioglass-reinforced composites as potential root-canal filling materials.
    Alhashimi RA; Mannocci F; Sauro S
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 May; 69():355-361. PubMed ID: 28161689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Bonding of restorative materials to dentin with various luting agents.
    Peutzfeldt A; Sahafi A; Flury S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 21740244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The bond of different post materials to a resin composite cement and a resin composite core material.
    Stewardson D; Shortall A; Marquis P
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(6):E1-12. PubMed ID: 22856648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Shear Bond Strength between Fiber-Reinforced Composite and Veneering Resin Composites with Various Adhesive Resin Systems.
    AlJehani YA; Baskaradoss JK; Geevarghese A; AlShehry MA; Vallittu PK
    J Prosthodont; 2016 Jul; 25(5):392-401. PubMed ID: 26215932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Elastic and fracture properties of dental direct filling materials.
    Beatty MW; Pidaparti RM
    Biomaterials; 1993 Oct; 14(13):999-1002. PubMed ID: 8286679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The influence of different cements on the fracture resistance and marginal adaptation of all-ceramic and fiber-reinforced crowns.
    Behr M; Rosentritt M; Mangelkramer M; Handel G
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):538-42. PubMed ID: 14651242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Compositional and microstructural design of highly bioactive P2O5-Na2O-CaO-SiO2 glass-ceramics.
    Peitl O; Zanotto ED; Serbena FC; Hench LL
    Acta Biomater; 2012 Jan; 8(1):321-32. PubMed ID: 22032913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. In vitro shear bond strength of cementing agents to fixed prosthodontic restorative materials.
    Piwowarczyk A; Lauer HC; Sorensen JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Sep; 92(3):265-73. PubMed ID: 15343162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A finite element thermal analysis of various dowel and core materials.
    Varghese S; Ariga P; Padmanaban TV; Subramanian R
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 22945706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. In vitro examination of the fracture strength of 3 different fiber-reinforced composite and 1 all-ceramic posterior inlay fixed partial denture systems.
    Kolbeck C; Rosentritt M; Behr M; Lang R; Handel G
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Dec; 11(4):248-53. PubMed ID: 12501138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Stability of hydroxyapatite while processing short-fibre reinforced hydroxyapatite ceramics.
    Knepper M; Moricca S; Milthorpe BK
    Biomaterials; 1997 Dec; 18(23):1523-9. PubMed ID: 9430334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of shear bond strength of three bonding agents with metal and ceramic brackets.
    Haydar B; Sarikaya S; Cehreli ZC
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):457-62. PubMed ID: 10515144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of a high fracture toughness composite ceramic for dental applications.
    Aboushelib MN; Kleverlaan CJ; Feilzer AJ
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Oct; 17(7):538-44. PubMed ID: 18761572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Biomaterials in dentistry.
    Smith DC
    J Dent Res; 1975 Jun; 54 Spec No B():B146-52. PubMed ID: 1055739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of ceramic and porous fillers on the mechanical properties of experimental dental composites.
    Zandinejad AA; Atai M; Pahlevan A
    Dent Mater; 2006 Apr; 22(4):382-7. PubMed ID: 16055180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Development of Bioglass for dental implantation].
    Wilson J; Stanley HR; Clark AE; Hench LL; Gross U
    Phillip J Restaur Zahnmed; 1988 Oct; 5(5):242-6. PubMed ID: 2855125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Glass ceramics as a bioactive implantation material].
    Strunz V; Bunte M; Stellmach R; Gross U; Kühl K; Newesely H; Brömer H; Deutscher K
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1976 Jan; 31(1):69-70. PubMed ID: 1060566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of interface characterization and adhesion of glass ceramics to commercially pure titanium and gold alloy after thermal- and mechanical-loading.
    Vásquez VZ; Ozcan M; Kimpara ET
    Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):221-31. PubMed ID: 18718654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of fiber type and wetting agent on the flexural properties of an indirect fiber reinforced composite.
    Ellakwa AE; Shortall AC; Marquis PM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):485-90. PubMed ID: 12473997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.