These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6860911)

  • 1. In situ femoropopliteal and distal vein bypass for limb salvage--experience of 50 cases.
    Denton MJ; Hill D; Fairgrieve J
    Br J Surg; 1983 Jun; 70(6):358-61. PubMed ID: 6860911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. New technique for construction of coposite Dacron vein grafts for femoro-distal popliteal bypass in the severely ischemic leg.
    Lord JW; Sadranagani B; Bajwa G; Rossi G
    Ann Surg; 1975 May; 181(5):670-5. PubMed ID: 124161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors determining outcome of reversed saphenous vein femoropopliteal bypass grafts.
    Sonnenfeld T; Cronestrand R
    Br J Surg; 1980 Sep; 67(9):642-8. PubMed ID: 7427063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Very distal bypass for salvage of the severely ischemic extremity.
    Quiñones-Baldrich WJ; Colburn MD; Ahn SS; Gelabert HA; Moore WS
    Am J Surg; 1993 Aug; 166(2):117-23; discussion 123. PubMed ID: 8352401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Salvage of in situ femoropopliteal and femorotibial saphenous vein bypass with interventional radiology.
    Kalman PG; Sniderman KW
    J Vasc Surg; 1988 Mar; 7(3):429-32. PubMed ID: 2964533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospectively randomized clinical trial to compare in situ and reversed saphenous vein grafts for femoropopliteal bypass.
    Harris PL; How TV; Jones DR
    Br J Surg; 1987 Apr; 74(4):252-5. PubMed ID: 3555691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Long-term patency of reversed and in situ femoro-popliteal bypasses].
    Marković DM; Davidović LB; Lotina SI; Kostić DM; Cinara IS; Svetković SD; Marković M; Zivanović N
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1999; 127(11-12):365-70. PubMed ID: 10686817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sparks mandril, velour Dacron and autogenous saphenous vein grafts in femoropopliteal bypass.
    Christenson JT; Eklöf B
    Br J Surg; 1979 Jul; 66(7):514-7. PubMed ID: 157181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospective randomized study on reversed saphenous vein infrapopliteal bypass to treat limb-threatening ischemia: common femoral artery versus superficial femoral or popliteal and tibial arteries as inflow.
    Ballotta E; Renon L; De Rossi A; Barbon B; Terranova O; Da Giau G
    J Vasc Surg; 2004 Oct; 40(4):732-40. PubMed ID: 15472602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Femoropopliteal bypass: in situ or reversed vein grafts? Ten-year results of a randomized prospective study.
    Watelet J; Soury P; Menard JF; Plissonnier D; Peillon C; Lestrat JP; Testart J
    Ann Vasc Surg; 1997 Sep; 11(5):510-9. PubMed ID: 9302064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The non-reversed vein femoro-distal bypass graft: a modification of the standard in situ technique.
    Beard JD; Wyatt M; Scott DJ; Baird RN; Horrocks M
    Eur J Vasc Surg; 1989 Feb; 3(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 2714455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prejudices and realities in the use of 'unsuitable' saphenous vein graft for infrapopliteal revascularization.
    Siani A; Accrocca F; Antonelli R; Giordano GA; Gabrielli R; Siani LM; Baldassarre E; Mounyergi F; Marcucci G
    G Chir; 2008; 29(6-7):261-4. PubMed ID: 18544261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Composite sequential grafts for femorocrural bypass reconstruction: experience with a modified technique.
    Mahmood A; Garnham A; Sintler M; Smith SR; Vohra RK; Simms MH
    J Vasc Surg; 2002 Oct; 36(4):772-8. PubMed ID: 12368738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Femoro-popliteal and femoro-distal bypass: a comparison between in situ and reversed technique.
    Bergmark C; Johansson G; Olofsson P; Swedenborg J
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1991; 32(1):117-20. PubMed ID: 2010440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Debatable Choice of Iliac Inflow Source for Redo Femoropopliteal and Infrapopliteal Bypass.
    Gabrielli R; Ciocca F; Dante A; Musilli A; Maiorano M; Ventura M
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2018 Oct; 52():316.e15-316.e19. PubMed ID: 29886210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Femoropopliteal prosthetic bypass with glutaraldehyde stabilized human umbilical vein (HUV).
    Neufang A; Espinola-Klein C; Dorweiler B; Messow CM; Schmiedt W; Vahl CF
    J Vasc Surg; 2007 Aug; 46(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 17600663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative evaluation of prosthetic, reversed, and in situ vein bypass grafts in distal popliteal and tibial-peroneal revascularization. Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group 141.
    Arch Surg; 1988 Apr; 123(4):434-8. PubMed ID: 3348735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sequential femorotibial bypass: clinical results.
    Jarrett F; Berkoff HA; Crummy AB
    Can J Surg; 1980 Jan; 23(1):78-80. PubMed ID: 7363163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In situ versus reversed femoropopliteal vein grafts: long-term follow-up of a prospective, randomized trial.
    Moody AP; Edwards PR; Harris PL
    Br J Surg; 1992 Aug; 79(8):750-2. PubMed ID: 1393459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Results of arterial reconstruction of the foot.
    Buchbinder D; Pasch AR; Rollins DL; Dillon BC; Douglas DJ; Schuler JJ; Flanigan DP
    Arch Surg; 1986 Jun; 121(6):673-7. PubMed ID: 3707343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.