These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6862452)

  • 1. Estimating the ascertainment probability from the number of ascertainments per proband.
    Simpson SP
    Hum Hered; 1983; 33(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 6862452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Models of multiple sources of ascertainments per proband.
    Yasuda N
    Jinrui Idengaku Zasshi; 1982 Mar; 27(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 7109315
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sampling schemes and ascertainment.
    Thompson EA; Cannings C
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1979; 32():363-82. PubMed ID: 523478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rheumatic fever susceptibility in four ascertainments: regressive segregation on a geometric ascertainment pattern.
    Sit KH
    J Hered; 1990; 81(6):428-33. PubMed ID: 2250095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Asymptotic rates of growth of the extinction probability of a mutant gene.
    Hoppe FM
    J Math Biol; 1992; 30(6):547-66. PubMed ID: 1640178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Aspects of parameter estimation in ascertainment sampling schemes.
    Ewens WJ
    Am J Hum Genet; 1982 Nov; 34(6):853-65. PubMed ID: 7180844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An easy-to-use maximum-likelihood method of estimating the ascertainment probability.
    Gladstien K; Kidd KK
    Am J Hum Genet; 1981 Sep; 33(5):785-801. PubMed ID: 7294027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimation of segregation and ascertainment probabilities by discarding the single probands.
    Li CC; Chakravarti A; Halloran SL
    Genet Epidemiol; 1987; 4(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 3609718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genetic drift in exogamous marriage systems.
    Cannings C
    Theor Popul Biol; 1975 Feb; 7(1):39-54. PubMed ID: 1129716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Likelihood models in human quantitative genetics.
    Elston RC
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1979; 32():391-405. PubMed ID: 523480
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mathematical contributions to population genetics.
    Kimura M
    Genetics; 1975 Jun; 79 Suppl():91-100. PubMed ID: 1150092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A simple new method for estimating null allele frequency from heterozygote deficiency.
    Brookfield JF
    Mol Ecol; 1996 Jun; 5(3):453-5. PubMed ID: 8688964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A cooperative binomial ascertainment model.
    Ginsburg EKh; Axenovich TI
    Am J Hum Genet; 1992 Nov; 51(5):1156-60. PubMed ID: 1415257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A background to human and medical genetics.
    Rickard BJ
    Guys Hosp Rep; 1967; 116(3):207-44. PubMed ID: 4871727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A bivariate problem in human genetics: ascertainment of families through a correlated trait.
    Dawson DV; Elston RC
    Am J Med Genet; 1984 Jul; 18(3):435-48. PubMed ID: 6476005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Choice of ascertainment model I. Discrimination between single-proband models by means of birth order data.
    Stene J
    Ann Hum Genet; 1978 Oct; 42(2):219-29. PubMed ID: 727713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Testing for haplotype concordance with incomplete parental data--modified Q and correction for modified N.
    Shah S; Green JR
    Ann Hum Genet; 1993 Jul; 57(3):239-47. PubMed ID: 8257093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ascertainment models incorporating effects of variable age of onset.
    Dawson DV
    Am J Med Genet; 1994 Dec; 53(4):340-7. PubMed ID: 7864043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating age-of-onset distributions for disorders with variable onset.
    Heimbuch RC; Matthysse S; Kidd KK
    Am J Hum Genet; 1980 Jul; 32(4):564-74. PubMed ID: 7395869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ascertainment bias for non-twin relatives in twin proband studies.
    Rice J; Gottesman II; Suarez BK; O'Rourke DH; Reich T
    Hum Hered; 1982; 32(3):202-7. PubMed ID: 7106785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.