These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6862812)

  • 21. Comparative effects of nonionic (iopamidol) and ionic (sodium and meglumine diatrizoate) contrast media for urography on urinary excretion of water and solutes.
    Garibotto G; Saffioti S; Garlaschi G; Gambaro A; Satragno L; Cittadini G
    Urol Radiol; 1986; 8(4):199-203. PubMed ID: 3798605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Renal contrastography with rapid intravenous injection of Iopamidol].
    Bianchi SD; Granone A; Gatti G; Mecozzi B; Andretta L
    Radiol Med; 1981 Sep; 67(9):668-9. PubMed ID: 7313186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Renal toxicity of contrast agents: iopamidol, iothalamate, and diatrizoate.
    Gale ME; Robbins AH; Hamburger RJ; Widrich WC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Feb; 142(2):333-5. PubMed ID: 6607603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of the side-effects of low-osmolar contrast media in intravenous urography.
    Foord KD; Kaye B; Howard J; Cumberland DC
    Clin Radiol; 1985 Jul; 36(4):379-80. PubMed ID: 4064528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Contrast and electrolyte dynamics of the intravenous pyelogram. II. Disparities in serum and urine concentrations of meglumine and anion.
    Lasser EC; Lang JH; Hamblin AE; Rosen L
    Invest Radiol; 1975; 10(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 1184320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison of the cardiovascular responses to carotid injections of ionic and nonionic contrast media.
    Morris TW; Francis M; Fischer HW
    Invest Radiol; 1979; 14(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 468493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Histamine liberation through renal roentgen contrast media: comparison of iopamidol and meglumine ioglicinate].
    Gmeinwieser J; Reimann HJ; Reiser M
    Rontgenpraxis; 1985 Nov; 38(11):396-9. PubMed ID: 2417338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The old and the new: a study of five contrast media for urography.
    Davies P; Panto PN; Buckley J; Richardson RE
    Br J Radiol; 1985 Jul; 58(691):593-7. PubMed ID: 3893610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Ventilatory function during urography: a comparison of iopamidol and sodium iothalamate.
    Wilson AR; Davies P
    Clin Radiol; 1988 Sep; 39(5):490-3. PubMed ID: 3180669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Urographic excretion studies with metrizamide and "Dimer": a high dose comparison in dogs.
    Evill CA; Benness GT
    Invest Radiol; 1977; 12(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 856757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. CT-determined canine kidney and urine iodine concentration following intravenous administration of sodium diatrizoate, metrizamide, iopamidol, and sodium ioxaglate.
    Brennan RE; Rapoport S; Weinberg I; Pollack HM; Curtis JA
    Invest Radiol; 1982; 17(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 7076442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Quality control in urography using non-ionic contrast media (iopamidol) and induced hydration].
    Stacul F; Bazzocchi M; Zanella F; Abbona M
    Radiol Med; 1986 Mar; 72(3):138-41. PubMed ID: 3704214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of iopamidol, ioxaglate, and diatrizoate during coronary arteriography in dogs.
    Thomson KR; Evill CA; Fritzsche J; Benness GT
    Invest Radiol; 1980; 15(3):234-41. PubMed ID: 7399847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Iopamidol: new preclinical and clinical data.
    Bonati F; Felder E; Tirone P
    Invest Radiol; 1980; 15(6 Suppl):S310-6. PubMed ID: 7203941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Elimination kinetics of iopamidol, a new water soluble nonionic radiographic contrast medium, analyzed by radioactivation.
    Muratore O; Saitta S; Mallarini G; Corvisiero P; Sanzone M
    Experientia; 1983 Jan; 39(1):119-21. PubMed ID: 6825773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of ionic and nonionic contrast media on the sickling phenomenon.
    Rao VM; Rao AK; Steiner RM; Burka ER; Grainger RG; Ballas SK
    Radiology; 1982 Jul; 144(2):291-3. PubMed ID: 7089282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Iopamidol: physicochemistry, toxicopharmacology].
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1983 Dec; 26(8 Pt 2):701-2. PubMed ID: 6670824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Comparison between ionic and non ionic contrast media in fast injection nephro-urography (author's transl)].
    Dalla Palma L; Rossi M; Stacul F; Agostini R
    Radiol Med; 1981; 67(1-2):55-60. PubMed ID: 7268075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Radiopaque contrast media. XLVI - Preliminary studies of the metabolism of iopamidol in the dog, the rabbit and man.
    Pitrè D; Tirone P; Viviani G
    Farmaco Sci; 1980 Oct; 35(10):826-35. PubMed ID: 7450018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Contrast and electrolyte dynamics of the intravenous pyelogram. I. Urinary pH and volume changes in the canine I. V. P.
    Lasser EC; Lang JH; Hamblin AE; Rosen L
    Invest Radiol; 1975; 10(4):300-6. PubMed ID: 241732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.