These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6863333)

  • 1. An assessment of subject variability, subject-shoe interaction, and the evaluation of running shoes using ground reaction force data.
    Bates BT; Osternig LR; Sawhill JA; James SL
    J Biomech; 1983; 16(3):181-91. PubMed ID: 6863333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of shoe cushioning upon ground reaction forces in running.
    Clarke TE; Frederick EC; Cooper LB
    Int J Sports Med; 1983 Nov; 4(4):247-51. PubMed ID: 6654550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does "transition shoe" promote an intermediate biomechanical condition compared to running in conventional shoe and in reduced protection condition?
    da Silva Azevedo AP; Mezêncio B; Valvassori R; Mochizuki L; Amadio AC; Serrão JC
    Gait Posture; 2016 May; 46():142-6. PubMed ID: 27131192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of pressure insoles to compare in-shoe loading for modern running shoes.
    Dixon SJ
    Ergonomics; 2008 Oct; 51(10):1503-14. PubMed ID: 18803091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of different running shoes on treadmill running mechanics and muscle activity assessed using statistical parametric mapping (SPM).
    Nüesch C; Roos E; Egloff C; Pagenstert G; Mündermann A
    Gait Posture; 2019 Mar; 69():1-7. PubMed ID: 30658310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Kinematic and kinetic comparison of running in standard and minimalist shoes.
    Willy RW; Davis IS
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2014 Feb; 46(2):318-23. PubMed ID: 23877378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical and physiological comparison of barefoot and two shod conditions in experienced barefoot runners.
    Squadrone R; Gallozzi C
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2009 Mar; 49(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 19188889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Running shoes, orthotics, and injuries.
    McKenzie DC; Clement DB; Taunton JE
    Sports Med; 1985; 2(5):334-47. PubMed ID: 3850616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Manipulation of Foot Strike and Footwear Increases Achilles Tendon Loading During Running.
    Rice H; Patel M
    Am J Sports Med; 2017 Aug; 45(10):2411-2417. PubMed ID: 28460179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The morphology of foot soft tissues is associated with running shoe type in healthy recreational runners.
    Zhang X; Delabastita T; Lissens J; De Beenhouwer F; Vanwanseele B
    J Sci Med Sport; 2018 Jul; 21(7):686-690. PubMed ID: 29239782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of a new sole geometry while running.
    Knoepfli-Lenzin C; Waech JC; Gülay T; Schellenberg F; Lorenzetti S
    J Sports Sci; 2014; 32(18):1671-9. PubMed ID: 24977468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acute effect of different minimalist shoes on foot strike pattern and kinematics in rearfoot strikers during running.
    Squadrone R; Rodano R; Hamill J; Preatoni E
    J Sports Sci; 2015; 33(11):1196-204. PubMed ID: 25529114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamic performance assessment of selected sport shoes on impact forces.
    Dufek JS; Bates BT; Davis HP; Malone LA
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1991 Sep; 23(9):1062-7. PubMed ID: 1943627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of foot, leg and shoe characteristics on subjective comfort.
    Miller JE; Nigg BM; Liu W; Stefanyshyn DJ; Nurse MA
    Foot Ankle Int; 2000 Sep; 21(9):759-67. PubMed ID: 11023224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Criteria for biomechanical tests for athletic shoes].
    Hennig E
    Sportverletz Sportschaden; 1993 Dec; 7(4):191-5. PubMed ID: 8146758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ground Reaction Force Differences between Bionic Shoes and Neutral Running Shoes in Recreational Male Runners before and after a 5 km Run.
    Jiang X; Zhou H; Quan W; Hu Q; Baker JS; Gu Y
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Sep; 18(18):. PubMed ID: 34574713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative Evaluation of Radiographic Parameters of Foot Pronation in Two Different Conditions versus Barefoot.
    Anselmo DS; Skolnik J; Keeter E; El-Sayed AM; Love E
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2018 Jul; 108(4):285-291. PubMed ID: 30156892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differences in plantar loading between training shoes and racing flats at a self-selected running speed.
    Wiegerinck JI; Boyd J; Yoder JC; Abbey AN; Nunley JA; Queen RM
    Gait Posture; 2009 Apr; 29(3):514-9. PubMed ID: 19147359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Footwear characteristics are related to running mechanics in runners with patellofemoral pain.
    Esculier JF; Dubois B; Bouyer LJ; McFadyen BJ; Roy JS
    Gait Posture; 2017 May; 54():144-147. PubMed ID: 28292715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Foot speed, foot-strike and footwear: linking gait mechanics and running ground reaction forces.
    Clark KP; Ryan LJ; Weyand PG
    J Exp Biol; 2014 Jun; 217(Pt 12):2037-40. PubMed ID: 24737756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.