These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6863348)

  • 41. A fatigue damage model for the cement-bone interface.
    Kim DG; Miller MA; Mann KA
    J Biomech; 2004 Oct; 37(10):1505-12. PubMed ID: 15336925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Innovations in acrylic bone cement and application equipment.
    Kindt-Larsen T; Smith DB; Jensen JS
    J Appl Biomater; 1995; 6(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 7703541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Self-reinforced composite poly(methyl methacrylate): static and fatigue properties.
    Gilbert JL; Ney DS; Lautenschlager EP
    Biomaterials; 1995 Sep; 16(14):1043-55. PubMed ID: 8519925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Bone-cement interface of the glenoid component: stress analysis for varying cement thickness.
    Terrier A; Büchler P; Farron A
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Aug; 20(7):710-7. PubMed ID: 15961203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Comparison of the mechanical properties of Simplex P, Zimmer Regular, and LVC bone cements.
    Davies JP; O'Connor DO; Greer JA; Harris WH
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1987 Jun; 21(6):719-30. PubMed ID: 3597461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Microtomography assessment of failure in acrylic bone cement.
    Sinnett-Jones PE; Browne M; Ludwig W; Buffière JY; Sinclair I
    Biomaterials; 2005 Nov; 26(33):6460-6. PubMed ID: 15967499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Thin film PMMA precoating for improved implant bone-cement fixation.
    Raab S; Ahmed AM; Provan JW
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1982 Sep; 16(5):679-704. PubMed ID: 7130220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Interfacial strength between molded UHMWPE and PMMA-MMA monomer treated UHMWPE.
    Park KD; Kang YH; Park JB
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1999; 9(4):303-18. PubMed ID: 10847970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Mechanical properties of new low viscosity bone cements--can be improved by vacuum mixing].
    Kaltenkirchen N; Fritsch E; Rupp S; Kraus P
    Unfallchirurg; 1996 Jul; 99(7):492-7. PubMed ID: 8928019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The effect of bleeding on the cement-bone interface. An experimental study.
    Majkowski RS; Bannister GC; Miles AW
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Feb; (299):293-7. PubMed ID: 8119032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Mechanical effects of the use of vancomycin and meropenem in acrylic bone cement.
    Persson C; Baleani M; Guandalini L; Tigani D; Viceconti M
    Acta Orthop; 2006 Aug; 77(4):617-21. PubMed ID: 16929439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The aging of polymethyl methacrylate bone cement.
    Fernandez-Fairen M; Vazquez JJ
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1983; 49(4):512-20. PubMed ID: 6624422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Biomechanical evaluation of kyphoplasty with calcium sulfate cement in a cadaveric osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture model.
    Perry A; Mahar A; Massie J; Arrieta N; Garfin S; Kim C
    Spine J; 2005; 5(5):489-93. PubMed ID: 16153574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Fatigue properties and stem subsidence in wire coil reinforced PMMA bone cement: a preliminary in vitro study.
    Kim JK; Park JB
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1996; 6(6):453-62. PubMed ID: 9138655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Pre-yield and post-yield shear behavior of the cement-bone interface.
    Mann KA; Allen MJ; Ayers DC
    J Orthop Res; 1998 May; 16(3):370-8. PubMed ID: 9671933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Reinforcement of bone cement using zirconia fibers with and without acrylic coating.
    Kotha S; Li C; Schmid S; Mason J
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2009 Mar; 88(4):898-906. PubMed ID: 18384160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparison of various vacuum mixing systems and bone cements as regards reliability, porosity and bending strength.
    Mau H; Schelling K; Heisel C; Wang JS; Breusch SJ
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2004 Apr; 75(2):160-72. PubMed ID: 15180231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparison of failure characteristics of a range of cancellous bone-bone cement composites.
    Lucksanasombool P; Higgs WA; Ignat M; Higgs RJ; Swain MV
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2003 Jan; 64(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 12483701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Shrinkage of centrifuged cement.
    Hamilton HW; Cooper DF; Fels M
    Orthop Rev; 1988 Jan; 17(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 3174195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparative fatigue behavior of different bone cements.
    Gates EI; Carter DR; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1984 Oct; (189):294-9. PubMed ID: 6478701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.