These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6863348)

  • 61. A fractographic investigation of PMMA bone cement focusing on the relationship between porosity reduction and increased fatigue life.
    James SP; Jasty M; Davies J; Piehler H; Harris WH
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1992 May; 26(5):651-62. PubMed ID: 1512284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Mechanical properties of the bone-prosthesis interface: a study of total hip joint prostheses stabilized with methyl methacrylate and porous ceramic.
    McCarthy TC; Wells MK
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1977 Apr 25-27; 13():41-6. PubMed ID: 871505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. [A quantitative analysis for determining porosity of pre-compressed and vacuum-mixed bone cement].
    Hahn M; Engelbrecht E; Delling G
    Chirurg; 1990 Jul; 61(7):512-7. PubMed ID: 2394193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Cement composite delivery system.
    Convery FR; Devine SD; Hollis JM; Woo SL
    Orthop Rev; 1986 Sep; 15(9):581-5. PubMed ID: 3453485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Bending properties of wire-reinforced bone cement for applications in spinal fixation.
    Saha S; Kraay MJ
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1979 May; 13(3):443-57. PubMed ID: 438229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Effects of laminations and blood entrapment on the strength of acrylic bone cement.
    Gruen TA; Markolf KL; Amstutz HC
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1976 Sep; (119):250-5. PubMed ID: 954319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Mechanical characteristics of the stem-cement interface.
    Mann KA; Bartel DL; Wright TM; Ingraffea AR
    J Orthop Res; 1991 Nov; 9(6):798-808. PubMed ID: 1919842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Influence of mixing technique on some properties of PMMA bone cement.
    Eyerer P; Jin R
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1986 Oct; 20(8):1057-94. PubMed ID: 3782171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. The fracture toughness of titanium-fiber-reinforced bone cement.
    Topoleski LD; Ducheyne P; Cuckler JM
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1992 Dec; 26(12):1599-617. PubMed ID: 1484065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. [A study on the mechanical properties of bone cement (methylmethacrylate) and its strength alteration in vivo (author's transl)].
    Kon H
    Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi; 1981 Jan; 55(1):71-83. PubMed ID: 7276662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Effect of an in vivo environment on the strength of bone cement.
    Rostoker W; Lereim P; Galante JO
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1979 May; 13(3):365-70. PubMed ID: 438225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. [Adhesive strength of metal/bone cement compounds and bone cement/spongioid bones].
    Klumpert R; Pauly T; Grootenboer HJ
    Aktuelle Probl Chir Orthop; 1987; 31():125-8. PubMed ID: 2888331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Tensile strength of the cement-bone interface depends on the amount of bone interdigitated with PMMA cement.
    Mann KA; Ayers DC; Werner FW; Nicoletta RJ; Fortino MD
    J Biomech; 1997 Apr; 30(4):339-46. PubMed ID: 9075001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Revision of cemented fixation and cement-bone interface strength.
    Rosenstein A; MacDonald W; Iliadis A; McLardy-Smith P
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 1992; 206(1):47-9. PubMed ID: 1418194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Mechanical strength of the cement-bone interface is greater in shear than in tension.
    Mann KA; Werner FW; Ayers DC
    J Biomech; 1999 Nov; 32(11):1251-4. PubMed ID: 10541077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Influence of preparation techniques to the strength of the bone-cement interface behind the flange in total knee arthroplasty.
    van de Groes SA; de Waal Malefijt MC; Verdonschot N
    Knee; 2013 Jun; 20(3):186-90. PubMed ID: 22999642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. [Adaptation of the viscoelastic behavior of bone cement to bone as a stabilizing factor in endoprostheses].
    Nikiforidis G; Bezerianos A; Lambiris E
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1989; 127(2):237-42. PubMed ID: 2735110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Factors influencing the creep behavior of poly(methyl methacrylate) cements.
    Treharne RW; Brown N
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1975 Jul; 9(4):81-88. PubMed ID: 1176512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Attachment of PMMA cement to bone: force measurements in rats.
    Skripitz R; Aspenberg P
    Biomaterials; 1999 Feb; 20(4):351-6. PubMed ID: 10048407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Cement disease.
    Jones LC; Hungerford DS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1987 Dec; (225):192-206. PubMed ID: 3315375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.