These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6863585)
1. A comparison of the intelligibility of esophageal, electrolaryngeal, and normal speech in quiet and in noise. Holley SC; Lerman J; Randolph K J Commun Disord; 1983 Mar; 16(2):143-55. PubMed ID: 6863585 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Perception of stop consonants produced by esophageal and tracheoesophageal speakers. Gomyo Y; Doyle PC J Otolaryngol; 1989 Jun; 18(4):184-8. PubMed ID: 2739001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of the Lombard Effect in Improving Alaryngeal Speech. Ng ML J Voice; 2021 Jan; 35(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 31350113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tone in Thai alaryngeal speech. Gandour J; Weinberg B; Petty SH; Dardarananda R J Speech Hear Disord; 1988 Feb; 53(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 3339865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Lombard effect associated with Chinese male alaryngeal speech. Ng ML; Tsang GCK Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2019 Dec; 21(6):584-592. PubMed ID: 30732483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of audio-visual information on the intelligibility of alaryngeal speech. Evitts PM; Portugal L; Van Dine A; Holler A J Commun Disord; 2010; 43(2):92-104. PubMed ID: 20005524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intelligibility characteristics of superior esophageal speech presented under various levels of masking noise. Horii Y; Weinberg B J Speech Hear Res; 1975 Sep; 18(3):413-9. PubMed ID: 1186150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Speech intelligibility, acceptability, and communication-related quality of life in Chinese alaryngeal speakers. Law IK; Ma EP; Yiu EM Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Jul; 135(7):704-11. PubMed ID: 19620593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Voice onset time in Thai alaryngeal speech. Gandour J; Weinberg B; Petty SH; Dardarananda R J Speech Hear Disord; 1987 Aug; 52(3):288-94. PubMed ID: 3455451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An acoustical and perceptual study of vowels produced by alaryngeal speakers of Cantonese. Ng ML; Chu R Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2009; 61(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 19299898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of three modes of alaryngeal speech with a synthetic sentence identification (SSI) task in varying message-to-competition ratios. Clark JG; Stemple JC J Speech Hear Res; 1982 Sep; 25(3):333-8. PubMed ID: 7176604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nasal consonants in esophageal speech. Miller WL; Hamlet SL J Speech Hear Disord; 1988 Feb; 53(1):108-11. PubMed ID: 3339862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of speech intelligibility between esophageal and normal speakers via three modes of presentation. Hubbard DJ; Kushner D J Speech Hear Res; 1980 Dec; 23(4):909-16. PubMed ID: 6160319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perceptual and acoustical analysis of alaryngeal speech: determinants of intelligibility. Drummond S; Dancer J; Krueger K; Spring G Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Dec; 83(3 Pt 1):801-2. PubMed ID: 8961316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Alaryngeal speech intelligibility and the older listener. Clark JG J Speech Hear Disord; 1985 Feb; 50(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 3974214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A sindscal analysis of perceptual features for consonants produced by esophageal and tracheoesophageal talkers. Doyle PC; Danhauer JL; Mendel LL J Speech Hear Disord; 1990 Nov; 55(4):756-60. PubMed ID: 2232755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of listener sophistication on judgements of tracheoesophageal talker intelligibility. Doyle PC; Swift ER; Haaf RG J Commun Disord; 1989 Apr; 22(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 2723141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]