267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6864120)
1. Guilty but mentally ill--in search of a perspective.
Ermutlu IM
J Med Assoc Ga; 1983 May; 72(5):345-9. PubMed ID: 6864120
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In defense of the insanity defense.
Beigel H
Hillside J Clin Psychiatry; 1983; 5(1):73-90. PubMed ID: 6662497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Psychiatrists and the insanity defense.
Rotenberg LA
Pa Med; 1983 Sep; 86(9):48-9. PubMed ID: 6685857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Insanity defense continues to draw attention in Washington, state capitols.
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1983 Jan; 34(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 6826158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Insanity plea in Connecticut.
Phillips BL; Pasewark RA
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1980; 8(3):335-44. PubMed ID: 7284609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Treating the not guilty by reason of insanity outpatient: a two-year study.
Cavanaugh JL; Wasyliw OE
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1985; 13(4):407-15. PubMed ID: 4074906
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Disposition of insanity defense cases in Oregon.
Bloom JL; Bloom JD
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1981; 9(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 7317657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Opinions concerning the insanity plea and criminality among mental patients.
Pasewark RA; Seidenzahl D
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1979; 7(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 540170
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of change in legal standard for those adjudicated not guilty by reason of insanity 1975-1979.
Criss ML; Racine DR
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1980; 8(3):261-71. PubMed ID: 7284602
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Georgia Court Competency Test: the base-rate problem.
Wildman RW; White PA; Brandenburg CE
Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Jun; 70(3 Pt 1):1055-8. PubMed ID: 2377402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Guilty but mentally ill: a retreat from the insanity defense.
Sherman SL
Am J Law Med; 1981; 7(2):237-64. PubMed ID: 7304614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The judge's view of competency evaluations.
Owens H; Rosner R; Harmon RB
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1985; 13(4):389-97. PubMed ID: 4074904
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Advisory Review Board and characteristics of patients on warrants of the Lieutenant Governor in Ontario.
Phillips MS; Landau T; Sepejak D; Osborne C
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1985; 13(4):373-84. PubMed ID: 4074902
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Examining the application of the guilty but mentally ill verdict in Michigan.
Petrella RC; Benedek EP; Bank SC; Packer IK
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1985 Mar; 36(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 3979974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Guilty but mentally ill.
Robey A
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1978; 6(4):374-81. PubMed ID: 752377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Competence to stand trial in Connecticut.
Herron DC; Zonana HV; Crane LE
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1983; 11(3):261-71. PubMed ID: 6640120
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. An introduction to law relevant to mentally disordered offenders.
Dolan B
Crim Behav Ment Health; 2004; 14 Suppl 1():S12-8. PubMed ID: 16575810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Forensic psychiatric assessment in the USSR].
Friemert K
Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol (Leipz); 1988 Nov; 40(11):671-7. PubMed ID: 3237873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Crime and the insanity defense, an international comparison: Ontario and New York state.
Greenland C
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1979; 7(2):125-38. PubMed ID: 231986
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Mentally disordered offenders and the insanity verdict.
Green CM
Can J Psychiatry; 1988 Nov; 33(8):778-80. PubMed ID: 3203283
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
