These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6864837)

  • 1. Efficacy of cervical spine immobilization methods.
    Podolsky S; Baraff LJ; Simon RR; Hoffman JR; Larmon B; Ablon W
    J Trauma; 1983 Jun; 23(6):461-5. PubMed ID: 6864837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of a SAM splint-molded cervical collar with a Philadelphia cervical collar.
    McGrath T; Murphy C
    Wilderness Environ Med; 2009; 20(2):166-8. PubMed ID: 19594206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cervical immobilization in trauma patients: soft collars better than rigid collars? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Bäcker HC; Elias P; Braun KF; Johnson MA; Turner P; Cunningham J
    Eur Spine J; 2022 Dec; 31(12):3378-3391. PubMed ID: 36181555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Emergency cervical-spine immobilization.
    Chandler DR; Nemejc C; Adkins RH; Waters RL
    Ann Emerg Med; 1992 Oct; 21(10):1185-8. PubMed ID: 1416294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cervical collars are insufficient for immobilizing an unstable cervical spine injury.
    Horodyski M; DiPaola CP; Conrad BP; Rechtine GR
    J Emerg Med; 2011 Nov; 41(5):513-9. PubMed ID: 21397431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improvised vs Standard Cervical Collar to Restrict Spine Movement in the Backcountry Environment.
    Porter A; Difrancesca M; Slack S; Hudecek L; McIntosh SE
    Wilderness Environ Med; 2019 Dec; 30(4):412-416. PubMed ID: 31706730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of cervical collars and verbal instructions in minimising spinal movement during self-extrication following a motor vehicle collision - a biomechanical study using healthy volunteers.
    Nutbeam T; Fenwick R; May B; Stassen W; Smith JE; Wallis L; Dayson M; Shippen J
    Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2021 Jul; 29(1):108. PubMed ID: 34332623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of two new immobilization collars.
    Rosen PB; McSwain NE; Arata M; Stahl S; Mercer D
    Ann Emerg Med; 1992 Oct; 21(10):1189-95. PubMed ID: 1416295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do cervical collars and cervicothoracic orthoses effectively stabilize the injured cervical spine? A biomechanical investigation.
    Ivancic PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(13):E767-74. PubMed ID: 23486409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Motion generated in the unstable cervical spine during the application and removal of cervical immobilization collars.
    Prasarn ML; Conrad B; Del Rossi G; Horodyski M; Rechtine GR
    J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2012 Jun; 72(6):1609-13. PubMed ID: 22695429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating a novel, low-cost technique for cervical-spine immobilization for application in resource-limited LMICs: a non-inferiority trial.
    Eisner ZJ; Delaney PG; Pine H; Yeh K; Aleem IS; Raghavendran K; Widder P
    Spinal Cord; 2022 Aug; 60(8):726-732. PubMed ID: 35194169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A practical radiographic comparison of short board technique and Kendrick Extrication Device.
    Howell JM; Burrow R; Dumontier C; Hillyard A
    Ann Emerg Med; 1989 Sep; 18(9):943-6. PubMed ID: 2764327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the Nebraska collar, a new prototype cervical immobilization collar, with three standard models.
    Alberts LR; Mahoney CR; Neff JR
    J Orthop Trauma; 1998 Aug; 12(6):425-30. PubMed ID: 9715451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Extrication, immobilization and radiologic investigation of patients with cervical spine injuries.
    Karbi OA; Caspari DA; Tator CH
    CMAJ; 1988 Oct; 139(7):617-21. PubMed ID: 3046734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cervical spine stabilization in pediatric patients: evaluation of current techniques.
    Huerta C; Griffith R; Joyce SM
    Ann Emerg Med; 1987 Oct; 16(10):1121-6. PubMed ID: 3662157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of a new cervical immobilization/extrication device.
    Joyce SM; Moser CS
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 1992; 7(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 10171177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The ability of external immobilizers to restrict movement of the cervical spine: a systematic review.
    Holla M; Huisman JM; Verdonschot N; Goosen J; Hosman AJ; Hannink G
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Jul; 25(7):2023-36. PubMed ID: 27032640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing the Efficacy of Methods for Immobilizing the Cervical Spine.
    Rahmatalla S; DeShaw J; Stilley J; Denning G; Jennissen C
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Jan; 44(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 29916958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Motion within the unstable cervical spine during patient maneuvering: the neck pivot-shift phenomenon.
    Lador R; Ben-Galim P; Hipp JA
    J Trauma; 2011 Jan; 70(1):247-50; discussion 250-1. PubMed ID: 21217496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effectiveness of various cervical orthoses. An in vivo comparison of the mechanical stability provided by several widely used models.
    Sandler AJ; Dvorak J; Humke T; Grob D; Daniels W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Jul; 21(14):1624-9. PubMed ID: 8839463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.