These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6866065)

  • 1. More on the Journal's book reviews.
    Kintner RM
    N Engl J Med; 1983 Aug; 309(5):316. PubMed ID: 6866065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Journal's book review policy.
    Dickstein ES
    N Engl J Med; 1983 Mar; 308(11):657-8. PubMed ID: 6828105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Current status of biomedical book reviewing: Part IV. Major American and British biomedical book publishers.
    Chen CC
    Bull Med Libr Assoc; 1974 Jul; 62(3):302-7. PubMed ID: 4466508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Letters: Periodical prices: U.S. medical titles.
    Barry JW
    Bull Med Libr Assoc; 1976 Jul; 64(3):335. PubMed ID: 938782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Book reviews, plain and fancy.
    N Engl J Med; 1969 Jun; 280(23):1299. PubMed ID: 5770057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Journal price survey by MLA Committe on Bibliographical Projects and Problems.
    Foreman G; Hodges TM; Love E; Smith RC; Swedenberg A; Weathers ME; Key JD
    Bull Med Libr Assoc; 1975 Apr; 63(2):228-31. PubMed ID: 1139067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An incomplete book review.
    Grinols EL
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2012 Feb; 31(2):460; discussion 461. PubMed ID: 22323180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Book reviewing: keeping the audience in mind.
    Hill K
    Nurse Author Ed; 1997; 7(1):4, 7-8. PubMed ID: 9397813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Book reviewers and book reviews: potential conflict of interest.
    Burd A
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2009 Apr; 62(4):446. PubMed ID: 19324324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Whose business is it?
    Plutchak TS
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2003 Jul; 91(3):277-9. PubMed ID: 12883569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What's in a review.
    Moore FD
    N Engl J Med; 1981 Apr; 304(14):840-1. PubMed ID: 7207514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Letter: Book prices.
    Lancet; 1975 Feb; 1(7901):272. PubMed ID: 46409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Homeopathy deserves more of this journal's attention.
    Garrett R
    Altern Ther Health Med; 2002; 8(2):18. PubMed ID: 11890380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Questions JAVMA's method of reviewing books.
    Feldmann BM
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2004 Feb; 224(3):360; author reply 360-1. PubMed ID: 14765793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Book reviews in scientific journals.
    Farr AD
    Med Lab Sci; 1981 Mar; 38(2):75-6. PubMed ID: 7339414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Who wants book reviews?
    Toner PG
    J Pathol; 1997 Oct; 183(2):127-8. PubMed ID: 9390021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The aspirin-heart study and the Journal's embargo policy.
    Barritt AS
    N Engl J Med; 1988 Sep; 319(12):800. PubMed ID: 3412411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Current status of biomedical book reviewing: Part V. Most frequently reviewed biomedical books in 1970.
    Chen CC
    Bull Med Libr Assoc; 1974 Jul; 62(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 4466509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The representation of an author's views.
    Bloche MG
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2012 Feb; 31(2):461; discussion 462. PubMed ID: 22323182
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A journal's duties: reporting or shaping the news.
    Jackson BS
    J Nurs Adm; 1991; 21(7-8):14-5. PubMed ID: 1869999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.