These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6866131)

  • 1. Affinity spectra: a novel way for the evaluation of equilibrium binding experiments.
    Tobler HJ; Engel G
    Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol; 1983 Apr; 322(3):183-92. PubMed ID: 6866131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The pharmacological basis of receptor binding.
    Schütz W
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1991; 103(15):438-42. PubMed ID: 1656614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multiple receptor populations: binding isotherms and their numerical analysis.
    Pliska V
    J Recept Signal Transduct Res; 1995; 15(1-4):651-75. PubMed ID: 8903971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of filtration and equilibrium dialysis methods for [3H]imipramine binding to human platelets.
    Lui N; Almon RR; Jusko WJ
    Anal Biochem; 1984 May; 139(1):42-57. PubMed ID: 6331229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pharmacologic methods for identification of receptors.
    Tallarida RJ
    Life Sci; 1988; 43(26):2169-76. PubMed ID: 2850427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Radioreceptor analysis: the theoretical bases of the method].
    Zaĭtsev SV; Sergeeva MG; Varfolomeev SD
    Bioorg Khim; 1985 Mar; 11(3):370-9. PubMed ID: 4004954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Competitive binding assays for high-affinity binders in the presence of endogenous ligands: application to biotin-binding proteins.
    Schreiber RW; Letavic MA; McGahan TJ; White HB
    Anal Biochem; 1991 Feb; 192(2):392-7. PubMed ID: 2035839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of graphical procedures for estimating the intrinsic molar fluorescence of protein-bound drugs for drug-binding studies. A reevaluation of existing plots and introduction of two inverse hyperbolic plots.
    Rajkowski KM
    Biochem Pharmacol; 1990 Mar; 39(5):895-900. PubMed ID: 2310414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative characterization of hormone receptors.
    Rodbard D; Munson PJ; Thakur AK
    Cancer; 1980 Dec; 46(12 Suppl):2907-18. PubMed ID: 7448735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ligand dissociation constants from competition binding assays: errors associated with ligand depletion.
    Goldstein A; Barrett RW
    Mol Pharmacol; 1987 Jun; 31(6):603-9. PubMed ID: 3600604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scatchard plot and heterogeneity in binding affinity of labeled and unlabeled ligand.
    Hollemans HJ; Bertina RM
    Clin Chem; 1975 Nov; 21(12):1769-73. PubMed ID: 1182995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radioligand-binding methods for membrane preparations and intact cells.
    Bylund DB; Deupree JD; Toews ML
    Methods Mol Biol; 2004; 259():1-28. PubMed ID: 15250483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analyzing radioligand binding data.
    Motulsky H; Neubig R
    Curr Protoc Protein Sci; 2001 May; Appendix 3():Appendix 3H. PubMed ID: 18429075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification of different subgroups of beta-receptors by means of binding studies in guinea-pig and human lung.
    Engel G
    Triangle; 1980; 19(2):69-76. PubMed ID: 6255638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A simple and rapid orientation procedure for the estimation of affinities (1/Kd) and maximum binding capacities (Bmax) of ligand binding to two receptor subpopulations.
    Hynie S; Bojar S; Klenerová V; Wenke M
    Physiol Bohemoslov; 1986; 35(4):299-307. PubMed ID: 3020601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical analysis of radioligand assay data.
    Rodbard D; Frazier GR
    Methods Enzymol; 1975; 37():3-22. PubMed ID: 1128249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A practical computer-based approach to the analysis of radioligand binding experiments.
    McPherson GA
    Comput Programs Biomed; 1983; 17(1-2):107-13. PubMed ID: 6319079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The kinetics of competitive radioligand binding predicted by the law of mass action.
    Motulsky HJ; Mahan LC
    Mol Pharmacol; 1984 Jan; 25(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 6708928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The analysis of data from breast cancer estrogen and progesterone receptor assays: Scatchard plots are inferior to direct fitting by computer.
    Cooke RR; McIntosh JE
    Clin Chim Acta; 1986 Feb; 154(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 3955843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analyzing binding data.
    Motulsky HJ; Neubig RR
    Curr Protoc Neurosci; 2010 Jul; Chapter 7():Unit 7.5. PubMed ID: 20578035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.