These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6866645)
1. Tests of a two-stage model of visual matching. Rosen K; Hershenson M Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Apr; 56(2):343-54. PubMed ID: 6866645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stimulus encoding by mentally retarded and nonretarded adults. Caruso DR; Detterman DK Am J Ment Defic; 1983 May; 87(6):649-55. PubMed ID: 6869423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of training on response latency and accuracy for a difficult visual discrimination. Whitaker LA Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Apr; 52(2):475-8. PubMed ID: 7255061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Binary-choice decision time depends upon cerebral hemisphere and nature of task. Schweitzer LR Percept Mot Skills; 1991 Aug; 73(1):147-61. PubMed ID: 1945679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Matching performance and the similarity structure of the stimulus set. Crist WB J Exp Psychol Gen; 1981 Sep; 110(3):269-96. PubMed ID: 6457077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perceived symmetry and visual matching. Hershenson M; Ryder J Am J Psychol; 1982; 95(4):669-80. PubMed ID: 7168458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Element and compound matching-to-sample performance in pigeons: the roles of information load and training history. Brown MF; Morrison SK J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1990 Apr; 16(2):185-92. PubMed ID: 2335772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rapid discrimination of visual patterns in children and adults. Saarinen J Percept Mot Skills; 1988 Feb; 66(1):247-52. PubMed ID: 3362648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The time course of configural change detection for novel 3-D objects. Favelle S; Palmisano S Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):999-1012. PubMed ID: 20436196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of spatial arrangement of letter pairs in a name-matching task with unilateral and bilateral hemifield stimulation. Schmitz-Gielsdorf J; Willmes K; Vondenhoff C; Hartje W Neuropsychologia; 1988; 26(4):591-602. PubMed ID: 3405402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Immediate and delayed recognition of sequentially presented random shapes. Hines D J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1975 Sep; 1(5):634-9. PubMed ID: 1176896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An analysis of emergent simple discrimination in children. Boelens H; Smeets P Q J Exp Psychol B; 1990 May; 42(2):135-52. PubMed ID: 2367687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Recognition of matching tasks and stimulus novelty as a function of unilateral brain damage. Paradowski W; Zaretsky H; Brucker B; Alba A Percept Mot Skills; 1980 Oct; 51(2):407-18. PubMed ID: 7443360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perception of figure orientation by nonambulatory children with profound mental retardation. Krenn MJ; Whiteley JH Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Jun; 70(3 Pt 1):867-70. PubMed ID: 2143012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transfer of stimulus differentiation and perceptual selection rules. Runquist WN; Sekulich C J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1979 May; 5(3):326-36. PubMed ID: 528915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of two diffusion process models in accounting for payoff and stimulus frequency manipulations. Leite FP Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1366-82. PubMed ID: 22669791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]