These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 686678)

  • 1. Characteristics of simple sibship variance tests for the detection of major loci and application to height, weight and spatial performance.
    Fain PR
    Ann Hum Genet; 1978 Jul; 42(1):109-20. PubMed ID: 686678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative linkage: a statistical procedure for its detection and estimation.
    Hill AP
    Ann Hum Genet; 1975 May; 38(4):439-49. PubMed ID: 1190735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The inheritance of metabolic flux: expressions for the within-sibship mean and variance given the parental genotypes.
    Ward PJ
    Genetics; 1990 Jul; 125(3):655-67. PubMed ID: 2379825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficient use of siblings in testing for linkage and association.
    Rieger RH; Kaplan NL; Weinberg CR
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Feb; 20(2):175-91. PubMed ID: 11180445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimal sibship selection for genotyping in quantitative trait locus linkage analysis.
    Purcell S; Cherny SS; Hewitt JK; Sham PC
    Hum Hered; 2001; 52(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 11359064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of family resemblance. V. Height and weight in northeastern Brazil.
    Rao DC; MacLean CJ; Morton NE; Yee S
    Am J Hum Genet; 1975 Jul; 27(4):509-20. PubMed ID: 1155459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of four sib-pair linkage methods for analyzing sibships with more than two affecteds: interest of the binomial maximum likelihood approach.
    Abel L; Alcais A; Mallet A
    Genet Epidemiol; 1998; 15(4):371-90. PubMed ID: 9671987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Structured exploratory data analysis: an evaluation of the use of three SEDA statistics in assessing mode of inheritance.
    MacCluer JW; Kammerer CM
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1984; 147():297-315. PubMed ID: 6739490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testing for linkage under robust genetic models.
    Guerra R; Wan Y; Jia A; Amos CI; Cohen JC
    Hum Hered; 1999 Jun; 49(3):146-53. PubMed ID: 10364679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Power and robustness of linkage tests for quantitative traits in general pedigrees.
    Chen WM; Broman KW; Liang KY
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005 Jan; 28(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 15493059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimal weighting scheme for affected sib-pair analysis of sibship data.
    Sham PC; Zhao JH; Curtis D
    Ann Hum Genet; 1997 Jan; 61(Pt 1):61-9. PubMed ID: 9066928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. General score tests for associations of genetic markers with disease using cases and their parents.
    Schaid DJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 1996; 13(5):423-49. PubMed ID: 8905391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors affecting inter-individual variation in human plasma cholinesterase activity: body weight, height, sex, genetic polymorphism and age.
    Brock A; Brock V
    Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 1993 Jan; 24(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 8466295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci.
    Blackwelder WC; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1985; 2(1):85-97. PubMed ID: 3863778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Power of a score test for quantitative trait linkage analysis of relative pairs.
    Goldstein DR; Dudoit S; Speed TP
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000; 19 Suppl 1():S85-91. PubMed ID: 11055375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving the robustness of the weighted pairwise correlation test for linkage analysis.
    Commenges D; Abel L
    Genet Epidemiol; 1996; 13(6):559-73. PubMed ID: 8968714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the within-sibship variance.
    Gimelfarb A
    Theor Popul Biol; 1983 Apr; 23(2):147-58. PubMed ID: 6612629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maximum-Likelihood-Binomial method for genetic model-free linkage analysis of quantitative traits in sibships.
    Alcaïs A; Abel L
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17(2):102-17. PubMed ID: 10414555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Heritability of adaptive variation.
    Klissouras V
    J Appl Physiol; 1971 Sep; 31(3):338-44. PubMed ID: 5165174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adding further power to the Haseman and Elston method for detecting linkage in larger sibships: weighting sums and differences.
    Shete S; Jacobs KB; Elston RC
    Hum Hered; 2003; 55(2-3):79-85. PubMed ID: 12931046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.