These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 686687)

  • 1. The generalized sib pair IBD distribution: its use in the detection of linkage.
    Suarez BK; Rice J; Reich T
    Ann Hum Genet; 1978 Jul; 42(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 686687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Consanguinity and the sib-pair method: an approach using identity by descent between and within individuals.
    Génin E; Clerget-Darpoux F
    Am J Hum Genet; 1996 Nov; 59(5):1149-62. PubMed ID: 8900245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Power of the affected-sib-pair method to defect disease susceptibility loci of small effect: an application to multiple sclerosis.
    Suarez B; O'Rourke D; Van Eerdewegh P
    Am J Med Genet; 1982 Jul; 12(3):309-26. PubMed ID: 6956238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The affected sib pair IBD distribution for HLA-linked disease susceptibility genes.
    Suarez BK
    Tissue Antigens; 1978 Aug; 12(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 705775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimal ascertainment strategies to detect linkage to common disease alleles.
    Badner JA; Gershon ES; Goldin LR
    Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Sep; 63(3):880-8. PubMed ID: 9718337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Linkage strategies for genetically complex traits. II. The power of affected relative pairs.
    Risch N
    Am J Hum Genet; 1990 Feb; 46(2):229-41. PubMed ID: 2301393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Linkage analysis in nuclear families. 1: Optimality criteria for affected sib-pair tests.
    Knapp M; Seuchter SA; Baur MP
    Hum Hered; 1994; 44(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 8163290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci.
    Blackwelder WC; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1985; 2(1):85-97. PubMed ID: 3863778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Log-linear models for gene mapping with affected sib pair data.
    Yang Y; Ott J
    Hum Hered; 2002; 53(4):227-36. PubMed ID: 12435886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of stratification in the analysis of affected-sib-pair data: benefits and costs.
    Leal SM; Ott J
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Feb; 66(2):567-75. PubMed ID: 10677317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A robust identity-by-descent procedure using affected sib pairs: multipoint mapping for complex diseases.
    Liang KY; Chiu YF; Beaty TH
    Hum Hered; 2001; 51(1-2):64-78. PubMed ID: 11096273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The affected sib method. V. Testing the assumptions.
    Louis EJ; Payami H; Thomson G
    Ann Hum Genet; 1987 Jan; 51(1):75-92. PubMed ID: 3314668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Partitioned association-linkage test: distinguishing "necessary" from "susceptibility" loci.
    Greenberg DA; Doneshka P
    Genet Epidemiol; 1996; 13(3):243-52. PubMed ID: 8797007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two-locus disease models with two marker loci: the power of affected-sib-pair tests.
    Knapp M; Seuchter SA; Baur MP
    Am J Hum Genet; 1994 Nov; 55(5):1030-41. PubMed ID: 7977340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A score test for the linkage analysis of qualitative and quantitative traits based on identity by descent data from sib-pairs.
    Dudoit S; Speed TP
    Biostatistics; 2000 Mar; 1(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 12933522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A robust method for the detection of linkage in familial disease.
    Fishman PM; Suarez B; Hodge SE; Reich T
    Am J Hum Genet; 1978 May; 30(3):308-21. PubMed ID: 677128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficiency of typing unaffected relatives in an affected-sib-pair linkage study with single-locus and multiple tightly linked markers.
    Holmans P; Clayton D
    Am J Hum Genet; 1995 Nov; 57(5):1221-32. PubMed ID: 7485174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Construction of a confidence set of markers for the location of a disease gene using affected sib pair data.
    Lin S
    Hum Hered; 2002; 53(2):103-12. PubMed ID: 12037409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The power of identity-by-state methods for linkage analysis.
    Bishop DT; Williamson JA
    Am J Hum Genet; 1990 Feb; 46(2):254-65. PubMed ID: 2301395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Affected sib pair identity by state analyses.
    Thomson G; Motro U
    Genet Epidemiol; 1994; 11(4):353-64. PubMed ID: 7813897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.