These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 686687)

  • 21. Adequacy of single-locus approximations for linkage analyses of oligogenic traits.
    Vieland VJ; Hodge SE; Greenberg DA
    Genet Epidemiol; 1992; 9(1):45-59. PubMed ID: 1634106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Multipoint linkage analysis using sib pairs: an interval mapping approach for dichotomous outcomes.
    Olson JM
    Am J Hum Genet; 1995 Mar; 56(3):788-98. PubMed ID: 7887435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Adequacy of single-locus approximations for linkage analyses of oligogenic traits: extension to multigenerational pedigree structures.
    Vieland VJ; Greenberg DA; Hodge SE
    Hum Hered; 1993; 43(6):329-36. PubMed ID: 8288263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A joint test of linkage and gene x environment interaction, with affected sib pairs.
    Gauderman WJ; Morrison JL; Siegmund KD; Thomas DC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17 Suppl 1():S563-8. PubMed ID: 10597493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Some epistatic two-locus models of disease. I. Relative risks and identity-by-descent distributions in affected sib pairs.
    Hodge SE
    Am J Hum Genet; 1981 May; 33(3):381-95. PubMed ID: 6941695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Absence of linkage between inflammatory bowel disease and selected loci on chromosomes 3, 7, 12, and 16.
    Rioux JD; Daly MJ; Green T; Stone V; Lander ES; Hudson TJ; Steinhart AH; Bull S; Cohen Z; Greenberg G; Griffiths A; McLeod R; Silverberg M; Williams CN; Siminovitch KA
    Gastroenterology; 1998 Nov; 115(5):1062-5. PubMed ID: 9797358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The impact of varying diagnostic thresholds on affected sib pair linkage analysis.
    Kendler KS
    Genet Epidemiol; 1988; 5(6):407-19. PubMed ID: 3209053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Optimal weighting scheme for affected sib-pair analysis of sibship data.
    Sham PC; Zhao JH; Curtis D
    Ann Hum Genet; 1997 Jan; 61(Pt 1):61-9. PubMed ID: 9066928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The power of two-locus affected sib-pair linkage analysis to detect interacting disease loci.
    Hallgrímsdóttir IB; Speed TP
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 32(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 17654608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Haseman and Elston revisited.
    Elston RC; Buxbaum S; Jacobs KB; Olson JM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Jul; 19(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 10861893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mathematical assumptions versus biological reality: myths in affected sib pair linkage analysis.
    Elston RC; Song D; Iyengar SK
    Am J Hum Genet; 2005 Jan; 76(1):152-6. PubMed ID: 15540158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of age at onset on the power of the affected sib pair and transmission/disequilibrium tests.
    Li H; Hsu L
    Ann Hum Genet; 2000 May; 64(Pt 3):239-54. PubMed ID: 11246475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A complete enumeration and classification of two-locus disease models.
    Li W; Reich J
    Hum Hered; 2000; 50(6):334-49. PubMed ID: 10899752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of marker information on sib-pair linkage analysis of a rare disease.
    Korczak JF; Pugh EW; Premkumar S; Guo X; Elston RC; Bailey-Wilson JE
    Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(6):625-30. PubMed ID: 8787984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The affected sib method. III. Selection and recombination.
    Payami H; Thomson G; Louis EJ
    Am J Hum Genet; 1984 Mar; 36(2):352-62. PubMed ID: 6711560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Two-locus approach of segregation and linkage analysis in the study of complex traits.
    Xu J; Taylor EW; Panhuysen CI; Prenger VL; Koskela R; Kiemeney B; LaBuda MC; Maestri NE; Meyers DA
    Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(6):825-30. PubMed ID: 8788016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Nonparametric trend statistic incorporating dispersion differences in sib pair linkage for quantitative traits.
    Kim MK; Hong YJ; Song HH
    Hum Hered; 2006; 62(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 16954696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Linkage analysis of alcohol dependence using both affected and discordant sib pairs.
    Shih PY; Wang T; Xing C; Sinha M; Song Y; Elston RC
    BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S36. PubMed ID: 16451646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Association tests in nuclear families.
    Siegmund KD; Gauderman WJ
    Hum Hered; 2001; 52(2):66-76. PubMed ID: 11474207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A note on the asymptotic properties of affected-sib-pair linkage tests.
    Wang K
    Ann Hum Genet; 2004 Jul; 68(Pt 4):367-75. PubMed ID: 15225162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.