These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6866990)

  • 21. Cephalometric profile of north Indians: Tweed's analysis.
    Kharbanda OP; Sidhu SS; Sundram KR
    Int J Orthod; 1991; 29(3-4):3-5. PubMed ID: 1802873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Enlargement and distortion in cephalometric radiography: compensation tables for linear measurements.
    Bergersen EO
    Angle Orthod; 1980 Jul; 50(3):230-44. PubMed ID: 6931505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Age- and sex-specific analysis of dentomaxillofacial measurements in children with normal and abnormal dental findings. 3. Sagittal and vertical relations of the anterior teeth].
    Graf H; Koch EM
    Stomatol DDR; 1981 Sep; 31(9):659-64. PubMed ID: 6948455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Comparative study of the intermaxillary angle, the interincisive angle and the ANB angle in a reported group of the Portuguese population, referred for orthodontic treatment].
    da Cruz JP
    Rev Port Estomatol Cir Maxilofac; 1980; 22(2):131-51. PubMed ID: 7348330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cephalometric norms for the Saudi children living in the western region of Saudi Arabia: a research report.
    Hassan AH
    Head Face Med; 2005 Aug; 1():5. PubMed ID: 16270926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cephalometric variation in patients with and without intraoral neuromuscular repositioning appliance.
    Learreta JA; Moses AJ
    J Gen Orthod; 1999; 10(2):14-21. PubMed ID: 10535034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Musical and architectural proportions in the anatomy of the facial system. An anthropometric approach.
    Muzj E
    Angle Orthod; 1982 Jul; 52(3):177-210. PubMed ID: 6959546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of 15 year old children with excellent occlusion and with crowding of the teeth, Angle Class I malocclusion, in respect of face size and shape and tooth size.
    Adams CP
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1982; 15():11-26. PubMed ID: 6963765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Do horizontal growers grow horizontally?
    Bookstein FL; Moyers RE
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1982; 15():179-87. PubMed ID: 6963772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of the reproducibility of manual tracing and on-screen digitization for cephalometric profile variables.
    Dvortsin DP; Sandham A; Pruim GJ; Dijkstra PU
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):586-91. PubMed ID: 18719051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Facial analysis without cephalometric radiography].
    Remmelink HJ; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2000 Apr; 107(4):141-4. PubMed ID: 11382969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Orthodontic cephalometric parameters: relative values of tracings taken from 100 adult female subjects].
    Miotti F; Miotti A
    Mondo Ortod; 1983; 8(3):9-13. PubMed ID: 6583505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of soft tissue facial morphometry in children with Class I and Class II occlusions.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Serrao G; Puletto S; Bignotto M; Tartaglia G
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(3):187-94. PubMed ID: 7814923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accuracy of combined maxillary and mandibular repositioning and of soft tissue prediction in relation to maxillary antero-superior repositioning combined with mandibular set back A computerized cephalometric evaluation of the immediate postsurgical outcome using the TIOPS planning system.
    Donatsky O; Bjørn-Jørgensen J; Hermund NU; Nielsen H; Holmqvist-Larsen M; Nerder PH
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 37(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 19188076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The use of parental data to evaluate soft tissues in an Anatolian Turkish population according to Holdaway soft tissue norms.
    Gelgör IE; Karaman AI; Zekiç E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):330.e1-9. PubMed ID: 16527625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Age- and sex-specific analysis of the dentomaxillofacial measures in children with normal and abnormal dental findings. 7. Morphological facial height and lower facial height].
    Graf H; Koch EM; Zellner K; Jaeger U
    Stomatol DDR; 1982 Feb; 32(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 6956034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Semilongitudinal cephalometric study of craniofacial growth in untreated Class III malocclusion.
    Alexander AE; McNamara JA; Franchi L; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):700.e1-14; discussion 700-1. PubMed ID: 19524825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of cephalometric mean values.
    Schmuth GP; Chow KW; Drescher D
    Eur J Orthod; 1988 Feb; 10(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 3162881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Three-dimensional facial morphometry and conventional cephalometrics: a correlation study.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Puleo A; Poggio CE; Schmitz JH
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1996; 11(4):329-38. PubMed ID: 9456609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Changes during treatment with a type III functional corrective appliance in the lateral teleradiograph].
    Renkerová M; Niczký E; Pintérová J
    Cesk Stomatol; 1982 May; 82(3):220-7. PubMed ID: 6955064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.