These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6867109)

  • 1. Estimation of a single property of low LET radiations which correlates with biological effectiveness.
    Goodhead DT; Brenner DJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1983 May; 28(5):485-92. PubMed ID: 6867109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Track structure analysis of ultrasoft X-rays compared to high- and low-LET radiations.
    Goodhead DT; Nikjoo H
    Int J Radiat Biol; 1989 Apr; 55(4):513-29. PubMed ID: 2564863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Track structure analysis illustrating the prominent role of low-energy electrons in radiobiological effects of low-LET radiations.
    Nikjoo H; Goodhead DT
    Phys Med Biol; 1991 Feb; 36(2):229-38. PubMed ID: 2008448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Energy deposition in small cylindrical targets by monoenergetic electrons.
    Nikjoo H; Goodhead DT; Charlton DE; Paretzke HG
    Int J Radiat Biol; 1991 Nov; 60(5):739-56. PubMed ID: 1680946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of X-ray and proton beam low energy secondary electron track structures using the low energy models of Geant4.
    McNamara AL; Guatelli S; Prokopovich DA; Reinhard MI; Rosenfeld AB
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2012 Jan; 88(1-2):164-70. PubMed ID: 22040102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combined use of Monte Carlo DNA damage simulations and deterministic repair models to examine putative mechanisms of cell killing.
    Carlson DJ; Stewart RD; Semenenko VA; Sandison GA
    Radiat Res; 2008 Apr; 169(4):447-59. PubMed ID: 18363426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Review of relative biological effectiveness dependence on linear energy transfer for low-LET radiations.
    Hunter N; Muirhead CR
    J Radiol Prot; 2009 Mar; 29(1):5-21. PubMed ID: 19225189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interaction between the biological effects of high- and low-LET radiation dose components in a mixed field exposure.
    Mason AJ; Giusti V; Green S; Munck af Rosenschöld P; Beynon TD; Hopewell JW
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2011 Dec; 87(12):1162-72. PubMed ID: 21923301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Energy deposition in small cylindrical targets by ultrasoft x-rays.
    Nikjoo H; Goodhead DT; Charlton DE; Paretzke HG
    Phys Med Biol; 1989 Jun; 34(6):691-705. PubMed ID: 2740437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modeling Radiation Effects of Ultrasoft X Rays on the Basis of Amorphous Track Structure.
    Buch T; Scifoni E; Krämer M; Durante M; Scholz M; Friedrich T
    Radiat Res; 2018 Jan; 189(1):32-43. PubMed ID: 29073360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monte Carlo simulations of a low energy proton beamline for radiobiological experiments.
    Dahle TJ; Rykkelid AM; Stokkevåg CH; Mairani A; Görgen A; Edin NJ; Rørvik E; Fjæra LF; Malinen E; Ytre-Hauge KS
    Acta Oncol; 2017 Jun; 56(6):779-786. PubMed ID: 28464743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. RBE vs. dose for low doses of high-let radiations.
    Katz R; Cucinotta FA
    Health Phys; 1991 May; 60(5):717-8. PubMed ID: 2019506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mechanisms for the biological effectiveness of high-LET radiations.
    Goodhead DT
    J Radiat Res; 1999 Dec; 40 Suppl():1-13. PubMed ID: 10804988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sequential exposures of mammalian cells to low- and high-LET radiations. II. As a function of cell-cycle stages.
    Ngo FQ; Blakely EA; Tobias CA; Chang PY; Lommel L
    Radiat Res; 1988 Jul; 115(1):54-69. PubMed ID: 3393635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiobiology of alpha particles. IV. Cell inactivation by alpha particles of energies 0.4-3.5 MeV.
    Raju MR; Eisen Y; Carpenter S; Jarrett K; Harvey WF
    Radiat Res; 1993 Mar; 133(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 8451379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Monte Carlo simulation of the RBE of I-131 radiation using DNA damage as biomarker.
    Ezzati AO; Mahmoud-Pashazadeh A; Studenski MT
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2017 Jun; 40(2):395-400. PubMed ID: 28397060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spectrum of Radiation-Induced Clustered Non-DSB Damage - A Monte Carlo Track Structure Modeling and Calculations.
    Watanabe R; Rahmanian S; Nikjoo H
    Radiat Res; 2015 May; 183(5):525-40. PubMed ID: 25909147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The survival response of a biological system to mixed radiations.
    Lam GK
    Radiat Res; 1987 May; 110(2):232-43. PubMed ID: 3575653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mammalian cell survival and radiation quality: analysis with allowance for delta tracks.
    Burch PR; Chesters MS
    Phys Med Biol; 1981 Nov; 26(6):997-1018. PubMed ID: 7323157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Track structure, lesion development, and cell survival.
    Brenner DJ
    Radiat Res; 1990 Oct; 124(1 Suppl):S29-37. PubMed ID: 2236507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.