These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6868375)

  • 1. Perceived size of letters depends on inter-letter spacing: a new visual illusion.
    Skottun BC; Freeman RD
    Vision Res; 1983; 23(1):111-2. PubMed ID: 6868375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Size and position are incongruous: measurements on the Müller-Lyer figure.
    Gillam B; Chambers D
    Percept Psychophys; 1985 Jun; 37(6):549-56. PubMed ID: 4059013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The moon size illusion does not improve perceptual judgments.
    Francis G; Cummins B; Kim J; Grzeczkowski L; Thunell E
    Conscious Cogn; 2019 Aug; 73():102754. PubMed ID: 31158723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Two kinds of apparent size distortion in the Ponzo illusion (author's transl)].
    Yamagami A
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1978 Dec; 49(5):273-9. PubMed ID: 748660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A method to assess the relative contribution of lateral inhibition to the magnitude of visual-geometric illusions.
    Coren S; Porac C; Aks DJ; Morikawa K
    Percept Psychophys; 1988 Jun; 43(6):551-8. PubMed ID: 3399353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The perceived size of targets in the peripheral and central visual fields.
    Bedell HE; Johnson CA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1984; 4(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 6728473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interocular induction of illusory size perception.
    Song C; Schwarzkopf DS; Rees G
    BMC Neurosci; 2011 Mar; 12():27. PubMed ID: 21396093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Size constancy does not fail below half a degree.
    Day RH; Stuart GW; Dickinson RG
    Percept Psychophys; 1980 Sep; 28(3):263-5. PubMed ID: 7433005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Some Illusions Are More Inconsistent Than Others.
    Smeets JBJ; Brenner E
    Perception; 2019 Jul; 48(7):638-641. PubMed ID: 31126210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Illusions in action: consequences of inconsistent processing of spatial attributes.
    Smeets JB; Brenner E; de Grave DD; Cuijpers RH
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Nov; 147(2):135-44. PubMed ID: 12410328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of contour proximity and lightness on Delboeuf illusions created by circumscribed letters.
    Jaeger T; Long S
    Percept Mot Skills; 2007 Aug; 105(1):253-60. PubMed ID: 17918573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The moon illusion revisited.
    Iavecchia JH; Iavecchia HP; Roscoe SN
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1983 Jan; 54(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 6830556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exorcising the double-nail illusion: giving up the ghost.
    Ono H
    Perception; 1984; 13(6):753-8. PubMed ID: 6543955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The paradoxical moon illusions.
    Gilinsky AS
    Percept Mot Skills; 1980 Feb; 50(1):271-83. PubMed ID: 7367178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retinal projection or size constancy as determinants of the horizontal-vertical illusion?
    von Collani G
    Percept Mot Skills; 1985 Oct; 61(2):547-57. PubMed ID: 4069920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of spatial frequency on colour selectivity in the tilt illusion.
    Lovegrove W; Badcock D
    Vision Res; 1981; 21(8):1235-7. PubMed ID: 7314506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The tilt illusion as a function of the relative and absolute lengths of test and inducing lines.
    Wenderoth P; O'Connor T; Johnson M
    Percept Psychophys; 1986 May; 39(5):339-45. PubMed ID: 3737365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The tilt illusion: length and luminance changes of induction line and third (disinhibiting) line.
    O'Toole BI
    Percept Psychophys; 1979 Jun; 25(6):487-96. PubMed ID: 492914
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial biases in number line bisection tasks are due to a cognitive illusion of length.
    Stöttinger E; Anderson B; Danckert J; Frühholz B; Wood G
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Jul; 220(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 22623099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Uznadze illusion reveals similar effects of relative size on perception and action.
    Uccelli S; Pisu V; Riggio L; Bruno N
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Apr; 237(4):953-965. PubMed ID: 30683958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.