These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6869639)

  • 1. Controlling the rise in cesarean section rates by the dissemination of information from vital records.
    Williams RL; Chen PM
    Am J Public Health; 1983 Aug; 73(8):863-7. PubMed ID: 6869639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cesarean section in California--1960 through 1975.
    Petitti D; Olson RO; Williams RL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Feb; 133(4):391-7. PubMed ID: 434002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Socioeconomic differences in rates of cesarean section.
    Gould JB; Davey B; Stafford RS
    N Engl J Med; 1989 Jul; 321(4):233-9. PubMed ID: 2747759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of changes in maternal age, parity, and birth weight distribution on primary cesarean delivery rates.
    Parrish KM; Holt VL; Easterling TR; Connell FA; LoGerfo JP
    JAMA; 1994 Feb; 271(6):443-7. PubMed ID: 8295319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cesarean section, fetal monitoring, and perinatal mortality in California.
    Williams RL; Hawes WE
    Am J Public Health; 1979 Sep; 69(9):864-70. PubMed ID: 474842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cesarean section rates in Italy by hospital payment mode: an analysis based on birth certificates.
    Bertollini R; DiLallo D; Spadea T; Perucci C
    Am J Public Health; 1992 Feb; 82(2):257-61. PubMed ID: 1739159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trends in cesarean section use in California, 1983 to 1990.
    Stafford RS; Sullivan SD; Gardner LB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Apr; 168(4):1297-302. PubMed ID: 8475978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of maternal age on cesarean section rates.
    Kirsop R; Jenkins GJ; Saunders DM; Houghton CR
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Aug; 32(3):206-7. PubMed ID: 1445127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cesarean birth in the border region: a descriptive analysis based on US Hispanic and Mexican birth certificates.
    McDonald JA; Mojarro Davila O; Sutton PD; Ventura SJ
    Matern Child Health J; 2015 Jan; 19(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 24791973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cesarean section use and source of payment: an analysis of California hospital discharge abstracts.
    Stafford RS
    Am J Public Health; 1990 Mar; 80(3):313-5. PubMed ID: 2305912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of maternal age on primary cesarean section rate.
    Witter FR; Repke JT; Niebyl JR
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1988 Aug; 27(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 2905298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors associated with cesarean delivery in public and private hospitals in a city of northeastern Brazil: a cross-sectional study.
    Vieira GO; Fernandes LG; de Oliveira NF; Silva LR; Vieira Tde O
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Jun; 15():132. PubMed ID: 26043857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of decreasing cesarean births on maternal age-, parity- and ethnicity-associated cesarean rates.
    Poma PA
    J Reprod Med; 2000 Mar; 45(3):213-8. PubMed ID: 10756499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variations in the use of cesarean delivery for dystocia: lessons about the source of care.
    McCloskey L; Petitti DB; Hobel CJ
    Med Care; 1992 Feb; 30(2):126-35. PubMed ID: 1736018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Incidence of and indications for cesarean sections in the Quebec, Canada region 1973 and 1979].
    Marcoux S; Fabia J
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1983; 31(4):459-68. PubMed ID: 6669773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pregnancy among the Hmong: birthweight, age, and parity.
    Helsel D; Petitti DB; Kunstadter P
    Am J Public Health; 1992 Oct; 82(10):1361-4. PubMed ID: 1415860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The physician factor in cesarean birth rates.
    Goyert GL; Bottoms SF; Treadwell MC; Nehra PC
    N Engl J Med; 1989 Mar; 320(11):706-9. PubMed ID: 2922015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do laborists improve delivery outcomes for laboring women in California community hospitals?
    Feldman DS; Bollman DL; Fridman M; Korst LM; El Haj Ibrahim S; Fink A; Gregory KD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 213(4):587.e1-587.e13. PubMed ID: 26026921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Elective cesarean section or not? Maternal age and risk of adverse outcomes at term: a population-based registry study of low-risk primiparous women.
    Herstad L; Klungsøyr K; Skjærven R; Tanbo T; Forsén L; Åbyholm T; Vangen S
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Aug; 16():230. PubMed ID: 27535233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variation in cesarean section rates among hospitals in Washington State.
    McKenzie L; Stephenson PA
    Am J Public Health; 1993 Aug; 83(8):1109-12. PubMed ID: 8342718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.