These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6870533)

  • 1. Delayed diagnosis of breast cancer as a result of normal mammograms.
    Pressman PI
    Arch Surg; 1983 Aug; 118(8):992. PubMed ID: 6870533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Delayed diagnosis of breast cancer as a result of normal mammograms.
    Mann BD; Giuliano AE; Bassett LW; Barber MS; Hallauer W; Morton DL
    Arch Surg; 1983 Jan; 118(1):23-4. PubMed ID: 6848070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. False-negative mammograms delay diagnosis of breast cancer.
    Burns PE
    N Engl J Med; 1978 Jul; 299(4):201-2. PubMed ID: 661900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of patients with false negative mammography and symptomatic breast carcinoma.
    Murphy IG; Dillon MF; Doherty AO; McDermott EW; Kelly G; O'Higgins N; Hill AD
    J Surg Oncol; 2007 Nov; 96(6):457-63. PubMed ID: 17929256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. False negative mammograms causing delay in breast cancer diagnosis.
    Burns PE; Grace MG; Lees AW; May C
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1979 Jun; 30(2):74-6. PubMed ID: 457739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Delayed diagnosis of breast cancer in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography.
    Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; de Koning HJ; Coebergh JW; van Beek M; Hooijen MJ; van de Poll-Franse LV
    Eur J Cancer; 2009 Mar; 45(5):774-81. PubMed ID: 19046632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use and abuse of mammography in the early diagnosis of breast cancer.
    Mahoney L; Csima A
    Can J Surg; 1983 May; 26(3):262-3, 265. PubMed ID: 6850440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ultrasound mammography: a comparison with radiographic mammography.
    Cole-Beuglet C; Goldberg BB; Kurtz AB; Rubin CS; Patchefsky AS; Shaber GS
    Radiology; 1981 Jun; 139(3):693-8. PubMed ID: 7232737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mammography in hospital patients: use and misuse.
    Woods WG; Earlam RJ; Turner MJ
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1992 Feb; 37(1):16-8. PubMed ID: 1573600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. False-negative mammograms in patients with breast cancer.
    Niloff PH; Sheiner NM
    Can J Surg; 1981 Jan; 24(1):50, 52. PubMed ID: 7459735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms.
    Yang SK; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Cha JH; Kim SM; Kim SJ; Im JG
    Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 17507722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of mammography in the diagnosis of breast cancer: survey in a community hospital.
    Hinkamp JF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1971 Dec; 111(8):1043-5. PubMed ID: 5129557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Screening mammography interpretation test: more frequent mistakes.
    Gozzi G; Martinoli C; Conti GM; Ganzetti A; Bodini M; Fiorentino C; Marini UP; Santini D; Bacigalupo L
    Radiol Med; 2005 Mar; 109(3):268-79. PubMed ID: 15775896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of menstrual phase on false-negative mammograms in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study.
    Baines CJ; Vidmar M; McKeown-Eyssen G; Tibshirani R
    Cancer; 1997 Aug; 80(4):720-4. PubMed ID: 9264355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Screening mammography: experience in a health maintenance organization.
    Hanchak NA; Kessler HB; MacPherson S; Xuan S; Solin LJ
    Radiology; 1997 Nov; 205(2):441-5. PubMed ID: 9356626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Physician predictors of mammographic accuracy.
    Smith-Bindman R; Chu P; Miglioretti DL; Quale C; Rosenberg RD; Cutter G; Geller B; Bacchetti P; Sickles EA; Kerlikowske K
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Mar; 97(5):358-67. PubMed ID: 15741572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can peer review contribute to earlier detection of breast cancer? A quality initiative to learn from false-negative mammograms.
    Siegal EC; Angelakis EJ; Hartman A
    Breast J; 2008; 14(4):330-4. PubMed ID: 18540960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of false-positive mammograms on interval breast cancer screening in a health maintenance organization.
    Burman ML; Taplin SH; Herta DF; Elmore JG
    Ann Intern Med; 1999 Jul; 131(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 10391809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: mammographic findings and extent of disease at diagnosis in 184 patients.
    Krecke KN; Gisvold JJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Nov; 161(5):957-60. PubMed ID: 8273634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Palpable cancer of the breast and negative mammography: the ongoing dilemma.
    Smith LF
    J Surg Oncol; 2007 Nov; 96(6):451-2. PubMed ID: 17469111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.