These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6871)

  • 21. Improved scheduling through block booking.
    Morgan DM
    Can Hosp; 1973 Feb; 50(2):41 passim. PubMed ID: 4779795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Better scheduling pulls cork out of O.R. bottleneck.
    Rourke AJ
    Mod Hosp; 1969 Jan; 112(1):101. PubMed ID: 5773619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An evaluation of operating room scheduling policies.
    Goldman J; Knappenberger HA; Moore EW
    Hosp Manage; 1969 Apr; 107(4):40-51. PubMed ID: 5798070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A computerized operating room scheduling and utilization system: one manager's experience.
    Slezak LG
    Perioper Nurs Q; 1986 Dec; 2(4):22-8. PubMed ID: 3642573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Scheduling a multiple operating room system: a simulation approach.
    Barnoon S; Wolfe H
    Health Serv Res; 1968; 3(4):272-85. PubMed ID: 5700370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Improving operating room efficiency by applying bin-packing and portfolio techniques to surgical case scheduling.
    Van Houdenhoven M; van Oostrum JM; Hans EW; Wullink G; Kazemier G
    Anesth Analg; 2007 Sep; 105(3):707-14. PubMed ID: 17717228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Patient waiting time matters when filling a pod of operating rooms.
    Dexter F; Wachtel RE
    Arch Surg; 2007 Nov; 142(11):1114; author reply 1114. PubMed ID: 18025347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. What works: scheduling. Integration inspiration.
    Health Manag Technol; 2001 Dec; 22(12):40-1. PubMed ID: 11766432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effective block scheduling strategies.
    Geuder DL; Banschbach SK
    Best Pract Benchmarking Healthc; 1996; 1(3):134-9. PubMed ID: 9192560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A fair policy for bumping OR cases.
    OR Manager; 2005 Mar; 21(3):18. PubMed ID: 15856673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The registration and scheduling processes.
    Bauman RA
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1986 Mar; 24(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 3961128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Surgical process scheduling: a structured review.
    Blake JT; Carter MW
    J Soc Health Syst; 1997; 5(3):17-30. PubMed ID: 9035021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Management science models for microcomputers in hospital administration.
    Khan AM
    Softw Healthc; 1985; 3(4):58, 61, 63. PubMed ID: 10273974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of centralized and decentralized information systems effects on radiology departments: an overview.
    Roberts JW
    Radiol Manage; 1979; 1(2):8-16. PubMed ID: 10243320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Enterprise integration. Balancing people, places and times.
    Cupito MC
    Health Manag Technol; 1998 Jun; 19(7):26-8, 30, 32-4. PubMed ID: 10181211
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A computerized anesthesia-operating room information system.
    Kane FR
    J Clin Eng; 1984; 9(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 10278280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Computer-assisted operating room scheduling.
    Hanson KH
    J Med Syst; 1982 Jun; 6(3):311-4. PubMed ID: 7119620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Using computers in the OR.
    De Vera F; Wesoloski N; Balog JW
    AORN J; 1983 Sep; 38(3):438, 440-1, 444-5. PubMed ID: 6556044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Medical applications of computers: an overview.
    Levinson D; Dambro MR
    J Fam Pract; 1984 Jul; 19(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 6376688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Pittsburgh hospital increases OR utilization by 60%.
    Perform Improv Advis; 2005 Jun; 9(6):65-6, 61. PubMed ID: 16097428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.