These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6871349)

  • 1. Assessment of diagnostic tests when disease verification is subject to selection bias.
    Begg CB; Greenes RA
    Biometrics; 1983 Mar; 39(1):207-15. PubMed ID: 6871349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Avoiding verification bias in screening test evaluation in resource poor settings: a case study from Zimbabwe.
    Gaffikin L; McGrath J; Arbyn M; Blumenthal PD
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(5):496-503. PubMed ID: 18827042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of diagnostic technologies. Methodology for unbiased estimation from samples of selectively verified patients.
    Greenes RA; Begg CB
    Invest Radiol; 1985 Oct; 20(7):751-6. PubMed ID: 3835974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A global sensitivity analysis of performance of a medical diagnostic test when verification bias is present.
    Kosinski AS; Barnhart HX
    Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(17):2711-21. PubMed ID: 12939781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adjusting for verification bias in diagnostic test evaluation: a Bayesian approach.
    Buzoianu M; Kadane JB
    Stat Med; 2008 Jun; 27(13):2453-73. PubMed ID: 17979150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A novel design for estimating relative accuracy of screening tests when complete disease verification is not feasible.
    Alonzo TA; Kittelson JM
    Biometrics; 2006 Jun; 62(2):605-12. PubMed ID: 16918926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Diagnostic accuracy].
    Simundić AM
    Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():93-111. PubMed ID: 16526310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A sequential design to estimate sensitivity and specificity of a diagnostic or screening test.
    Wruck LM; Yiannoutsos CT; Hughes MD
    Stat Med; 2006 Oct; 25(20):3458-73. PubMed ID: 16374904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Insights into latent class analysis of diagnostic test performance.
    Pepe MS; Janes H
    Biostatistics; 2007 Apr; 8(2):474-84. PubMed ID: 17085745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multivariable adjustments counteract spectrum and test review bias in accuracy studies.
    Bachmann LM; ter Riet G; Weber WE; Kessels AG
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Apr; 62(4):357-361.e2. PubMed ID: 18620840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing accuracy of mammography in the presence of verification bias and intrareader correlation.
    Zheng Y; Barlow WE; Cutter G
    Biometrics; 2005 Mar; 61(1):259-68. PubMed ID: 15737102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Design and analysis of group sequential logrank tests in maximum duration versus information trials.
    Kim K; Boucher H; Tsiatis AA
    Biometrics; 1995 Sep; 51(3):988-1000. PubMed ID: 7548714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating medical diagnostic tests at the subunit level in the presence of verification bias.
    Barnhart HX; Kosinski AS
    Stat Med; 2003 Jul; 22(13):2161-76. PubMed ID: 12820281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Properties of diagnostic data distributions.
    Dawid AP
    Biometrics; 1976 Sep; 32(3):647-58. PubMed ID: 963177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robustness of prevalence estimates derived from misclassified data from administrative databases.
    Ladouceur M; Rahme E; Pineau CA; Joseph L
    Biometrics; 2007 Mar; 63(1):272-9. PubMed ID: 17447953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The performance of sample selection estimators to control for attrition bias.
    Grasdal A
    Health Econ; 2001 Jul; 10(5):385-98. PubMed ID: 11466801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A test for serial correlation in univariate repeated-measures analysis.
    Hearne EM; Clark GM; Hatch JP
    Biometrics; 1983 Mar; 39(1):237-43. PubMed ID: 6871352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variance estimation in clinical studies with interim sample size re-estimation.
    Miller F
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):355-61. PubMed ID: 16011681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Methods of investigation in clinical cardiology. X. Studies on the evaluation of diagnostic tests in cardiology].
    Cabello López JB; Pozo Rodríguez P
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 1997 Jul; 50(7):507-19. PubMed ID: 9304178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Confidence in polymerase chain reaction diagnosis can be improved by Bayesian estimation of post-test disease probability.
    Kelly P; Pereira-Maxwell F; Carnaby S; White I
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Mar; 58(3):252-60. PubMed ID: 15718114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.