These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6871366)

  • 21. Properties of alternative estimators of familial correlations under variable sibship size.
    Vogler GP; Wette R; McGue MK; Rao DC
    Biometrics; 1995 Mar; 51(1):276-83. PubMed ID: 7766782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Small-sample bias of point estimators of the odds ratio from matched sets.
    Jewell NP
    Biometrics; 1984 Jun; 40(2):421-35. PubMed ID: 6487726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Maximum likelihood estimation of the attributable fraction from logistic models.
    Greenland S; Drescher K
    Biometrics; 1993 Sep; 49(3):865-72. PubMed ID: 8241375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Semi-parametric regression models for cost-effectiveness analysis: improving the efficiency of estimation from censored data.
    Pullenayegum EM; Willan AR
    Stat Med; 2007 Jul; 26(17):3274-99. PubMed ID: 17309112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The impact of litter effects on dose-response modeling in teratology.
    Kupper LL; Portier C; Hogan MD; Yamamoto E
    Biometrics; 1986 Mar; 42(1):85-98. PubMed ID: 3719065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Five interval estimators for proportion ratio under a stratified randomized clinical trial with noncompliance.
    Lui KJ; Chang KC
    Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(4):613-26. PubMed ID: 17634977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Multivariate slope ratio assay with repeated measurements.
    Hui SL; Rosenberg SH
    Biometrics; 1985 Mar; 41(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 4005369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A new method for dealing with measurement error in explanatory variables of regression models.
    Freedman LS; Fainberg V; Kipnis V; Midthune D; Carroll RJ
    Biometrics; 2004 Mar; 60(1):172-81. PubMed ID: 15032787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Estimation of the combined response to treatment in multicenter trials.
    Dragalin V; Fedorov V; Jones B; Rockhold F
    J Biopharm Stat; 2001 Nov; 11(4):275-95. PubMed ID: 12018780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Maximum likelihood estimation of correction for dilution bias in simple linear regression using replicates from subjects with extreme first measurements.
    Berglund L; Garmo H; Lindbäck J; Svärdsudd K; Zethelius B
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4397-407. PubMed ID: 18618419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. External comparisons from nested case-control designs.
    Suissa S; Edwardes MD; Boivin JF
    Epidemiology; 1998 Jan; 9(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 9430272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The analysis of case-control studies under validation subsampling.
    Schill W; Jöckel KH
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 1993 Oct; 47 Suppl 2():S34-41. PubMed ID: 8262016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Estimators of the Mantel-Haenszel variance consistent in both sparse data and large-strata limiting models.
    Robins J; Breslow N; Greenland S
    Biometrics; 1986 Jun; 42(2):311-23. PubMed ID: 3741973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Bayesian design for dose-response curves with penalized risk.
    Sun D; Tsutakawa RK
    Biometrics; 1997 Dec; 53(4):1262-73. PubMed ID: 9423248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. On the inadmissibility of Watterson's estimator.
    Futschik A; Gach F
    Theor Popul Biol; 2008 Mar; 73(2):212-21. PubMed ID: 18215409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Modeling matching error and its effect on estimates of census coverage error.
    Biemer PP
    Surv Methodol; 1988 Jun; 14(1):117-34, 125-43. PubMed ID: 12315617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Estimating pairwise relatedness from dominant genetic markers.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol; 2004 Oct; 13(10):3169-78. PubMed ID: 15367129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The performance of random coefficient regression in accounting for residual confounding.
    Gustafson P; Greenland S
    Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):760-8. PubMed ID: 16984318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Role of the standard deviation in the estimation of benchmark doses with continuous data.
    Gaylor DW; Slikker W
    Risk Anal; 2004 Dec; 24(6):1683-7. PubMed ID: 15660621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Judgement post-stratification for designed experiments.
    Du J; MacEachern SN
    Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):345-54. PubMed ID: 17888038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.