These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6871694)

  • 1. Operant conditioning of trigeminally-evoked cortical potentials: correlated effects on facial nociception.
    Dowman R; Rosenfeld JP; Heinricher M
    Brain Res; 1983 Jun; 269(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 6871694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Operant conditioning of somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) amplitude in rats. II. Associated changes in reflex and continuous non-timelocked movements.
    Dowman R; Rosenfeld JP
    Brain Res; 1985 May; 333(2):213-22. PubMed ID: 3995294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Operant conditioning of somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) amplitude in rats. I. Specific changes in SEP amplitude and a naloxone-reversible somatotopically specific change in facial nociception.
    Dowman R; Rosenfeld JP
    Brain Res; 1985 May; 333(2):201-12. PubMed ID: 3995293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cortical potentials evoked by innocuous tactile and noxious thermal stimulation in the rat: differences in localization and latency.
    Isseroff RG; Sarne Y; Carmon A; Isseroff A
    Behav Neural Biol; 1982 Jul; 35(3):294-307. PubMed ID: 7181820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of operantly conditioning the amplitude of the P200 peak of the SEP on pain sensitivity and the spinal nociceptive withdrawal reflex in humans.
    Dowman R
    Psychophysiology; 1996 May; 33(3):252-61. PubMed ID: 8936394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A further examination of effects of cortical stimulation on primate spinothalamic tract cells.
    Yezierski RP; Gerhart KD; Schrock BJ; Willis WD
    J Neurophysiol; 1983 Feb; 49(2):424-41. PubMed ID: 6834085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences between primary somatosensory cortex- and vertex-derived somatosensory-evoked potentials in the rat.
    Stienen PJ; van den Brom WE; de Groot HN; Venker-van Haagen AJ; Hellebrekers LJ
    Brain Res; 2004 Dec; 1030(2):256-66. PubMed ID: 15571674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trigeminal evoked potentials in humans.
    Bennett MH; Jannetta PJ
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1980 May; 48(5):517-26. PubMed ID: 6153960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Responses of rat medullary dorsal horn neurons following intranasal noxious chemical stimulation: effects of stimulus intensity, duration, and interstimulus interval.
    Peppel P; Anton F
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Dec; 70(6):2260-75. PubMed ID: 8120581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differentiating hemodynamic responses in rat primary somatosensory cortex during non-noxious and noxious electrical stimulation by optical imaging.
    Luo W; Li P; Chen S; Zeng S; Luo Q
    Brain Res; 2007 Feb; 1133(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 17196176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Operant conditioning of primate spinal reflexes: effect on cortical SEPs.
    Wolpaw JR; Dowman R
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1988 Apr; 69(4):398-401. PubMed ID: 2450739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Responses of nociceptive SI neurons in monkeys and pain sensation in humans elicited by noxious thermal stimulation: effect of interstimulus interval.
    Chudler EH; Anton F; Dubner R; Kenshalo DR
    J Neurophysiol; 1990 Mar; 63(3):559-69. PubMed ID: 2329361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Somatosensory-evoked potentials indicate increased unpleasantness of noxious stimuli in response to increasing stimulus intensities in the rat.
    van Oostrom H; Stienen PJ; van den Bos R; de Groot HN; Hellebrekers LJ
    Brain Res Bull; 2007 Jan; 71(4):404-9. PubMed ID: 17208658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trigeminal somatosensory evoked magnetic fields to tactile stimulation.
    Nevalainen P; Ramstad R; Isotalo E; Haapanen ML; Lauronen L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Sep; 117(9):2007-15. PubMed ID: 16859989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Change in trigeminal somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) at different recording sites in cats.
    Iwata K; Ikukawa A; Kita S; Fujii O; Kondoh K; Sumino R
    J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1985 Dec; 27(4):218-27. PubMed ID: 3867739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differences in perception and brain activation following stimulation by large versus small area cutaneous surface electrodes.
    Lelic D; Mørch CD; Hennings K; Andersen OK; Drewes AM
    Eur J Pain; 2012 Jul; 16(6):827-37. PubMed ID: 22337577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Heterotopic painful stimulation decreases the late component of somatosensory evoked potentials induced by electrical tooth stimulation.
    Motohashi K; Umino M
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2001 Mar; 11(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 11240110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trigeminal somatosensory innervation of the head of a teleost fish with particular reference to nociception.
    Sneddon LU
    Brain Res; 2003 May; 972(1-2):44-52. PubMed ID: 12711077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The rostral part of the trigeminal sensory complex is involved in orofacial nociception.
    Dallel R; Raboisson P; Auroy P; Woda A
    Brain Res; 1988 May; 448(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 3390718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cutaneous painful laser stimuli evoke responses recorded directly from primary somatosensory cortex in awake humans.
    Ohara S; Crone NE; Weiss N; Treede RD; Lenz FA
    J Neurophysiol; 2004 Jun; 91(6):2734-46. PubMed ID: 14602841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.